Homosexuality will never be or should be a Protect Class

private Charities should be able too yes.....

same with Private Clubs....


.

 

By your logic we're all whining here for voicing displeasure with anything If you say anything about women having too much, you're immediately labeled a chauvinist and bigot. People have tried. They're shouted down by girl power. You know protected class and all. That's the whole point, men HAVE TO take it. Its what we do. Lawyers who defend only men in divorce cases are PIGS. Female lawyers who only defend women are heroes.

 

But of course!

 

But female only scholarships are NOT private. http://www.scholarshipsforwomen.net/government/

Yep, couldn't find any for white males only...

- - - Updated - - -

Good glad you're logical.

 

Government grants should be equal, not discriminate

 

so one will be required to be issued a card certified by a professional psychiatrist that the holder is transgender to be considered transgender?

 

Not on a weekly basis.

 

Sure. Do you think bill can walk into the school and say, today I am a girl and I will use the girl bathroom and showers and join the girls softball team?
Without some merit to doing it.
Then next week he wants to play baseball, so he changes his mind and becomes a boy again. Not gonna happen.

 

I linked to the actual text of the law. Did you see anything in there that might suggest it is not on a weekly basis?

 

No, but the issue is making legal the action of marriage or the act itself. In this case, you're comparing a dude boinking or marrying his chocolate lab to two grown adult human males marrying or having sex.

 

`
You only represent only yourself, not all men. I've already stated that there are areas of law that in my opinion are egregiously wrong; child custody, child support and adoption, for example, and will support any legal initiative that corrects that imbalance. But I have zero sympathy for hyperbolic and vague innuendos.
`
`
`
`

 

no the issue is plainly spelled out to you in the title and content of the OP

 

The only statement is about a sex identity could be different than one on record. Meaning the records may not be up to date.

 

No, the text is quite explicit about this. It doesn't matter what gender is on the school records, be they currently up to date, or not.

 

Interracial marriage and perversions are two very different things...only the warped left compares them

 

When the left is in charge interpretation is skewed. That is the problem with the court, it has decided that politics is more important, just like Holder.

 

NOPE - The only way is to say you are confused...not altered, not a transgender. It speaks volumes that the left will defend this, and toss little girls expectation of privacy under the bus.

 

My grand girls don't have a choice, they can't just start attending schools in another less progressively dominated state. As bad as CA is. Mass is even worse. I am upset because the rabid left places politics, places their agendas above all things and could care less about the fall out. In fact, they laugh it off...they excuse it, dismiss it or they make weak excuses.

Philadelphia decides that the working public must fund additional school work projects to protect a specific class of society, based solely upon a warped sexual preference? Incredible.

This is just the tip of the ice berg, the court opened up a huge pandora's box...as usual the left decides to treat a symptom of a disease with a quick fix, then the results of that quick fix create bigger problems...and you can bet the left will then be pointing fingers of blame for those results in the wrong direction.

 

You do what the court did...you ignore the Constitution and declare the term state means FED and that instead of interpreting law, you assume what the intent must have been.

- - - Updated - - -

Here's why they need to be there...are you open minded enough to listen to 10 minutes worth of historical logic?

https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q=c+s+lewis+natural+law&FORM=HDRSC3#view=detail&mid=75F16B8C639F89687EED75F16B8C639F89687EED

 

Trust me...no one is afraid of gays and lesbians.

- - - Updated - - -

Separation clause? You mean a letter to a church to tell them the gov must stay out of religious pursuits?

 

You're just playing with words... some of which you clearly do not know what the definition... entails. But the bottom line is that homosexuality harms nobody, pedophilia does. And zoophilia - guess it depends on if you're okay with animal torture. We kill them and eat them, so whatever on that one.

 

No one is telling another how to live or not live. Christians are being forced to "act" the way the left expects them to act...by enacting laws that limit their faith, limit their beliefs and control more and more of their lives.

It is clear that the entire purpose is to destroy the church, because morality makes some uncomfortable and feel convicted.

 

The courts last two political decisions have affected many...you can bet that just like me, they realize now is the time to say....no more treading on me. I will be taking political action and as an activist for a cause worthy of fighting for. My grand children deserve better.

- - - Updated - - -

An adult child and hi mother are two consenting adults...is that also not something that creates an ich factor, is that not a perversion? If it is...what is the difference? A perversion is a perversion.

- - - Updated - - -

You think you know the law...you should do more research.

 

not hardly, do whatever you want in your private lives as long as your not hurting others.... in if you run a business open to the public, don't discriminate or falsely advertise a product as for sale, simple really

 

How often does your right to an expectation of privacy have to be violated before it is no longer acceptable to the leftist's?

- - - Updated - - -

You are using theories and hypothetical's, to explain how something MAY not happen? Meanwhile little girls expectation to privacy is considered less important?