Exactly you accept the points and are happy to portray yourself as such. The fact you continue to push your insults (clearly showing your desperation) also shows different from what you think it does.
Obviously you remained in the dark about that point. The fact you decided that the "blonde" statement was the original target shows that it is YOUR bigotry you impress on the world. Any offence you consider to be accepted or sent is of your understanding of what you consider to be received. Since YOU made the comment and YOU assume others are offended by such means you consider the comment to be bigotry. The fact you decided this to be the point of contention also indicates you consider the comment would be bigotry and could only be accepted in such a fashion. The fact you then have to comment on such as being offensive, and that anybody who takes offence are of less character than yourself clearly demonstrates ignorance and intolerance. OR racism and bigotry. So when you assume this… You are assuming it to be an insult as you intend it to be. Clearly, if you do believe the assertion of such as being an insult, the point you attempt to gain has doubled down against you.
Yeah I take exception to you insulting blondes SW. Couldn't you at least associate him with reds or something!
You are putting far too much energy into this. You complain about insults but you took a tongue in cheek post of mine and decided to make references and remarks on my character. I really dont care Mr whoever the f@ck you are on the interwebs.
lol I take it you are a blonde I was kidding I really like blondes lol let me be clear, I am going to vote for a blonde, an intelligent female barrister very much worthy of my vote.
Again, you make the point I raised. You still seem hung up on the issue of the "blonde" issue YOU have decided was the point. Again it was not. The fact you insist that this is nothing but "a tongue in cheek" and launched a tirade of comments with nothing but insult without the understanding of what was being pointed out or said simply demonstrates that your comment while in the guise of being a "JOKE" by your own admission is far from the proclaimed sentiment. While nobody said anything you assumed it would be OK, but when a point of which is clearly lost on you is raised out comes "it was only a joke". I make note of the bigotry you portray as in future everybody will know where your thoughts originate. I simply point to that as being what you portray. Dont like it, perhaps you should think MORE before posting comments that will be read around the world The fact you continue to defend with such veracity clearly shows nothing you have said is true. It is abundantly obvious that you care a great deal what others think and wish to impress your superiority over others who YOU consider oppose your position. The fact you point to MY character in your first response allows you NOTHING of victim status with anybody except fellow ignorant cohorts. The fact you made incorrect assumptions of what is being also allows nothing of victim status as you NOW wish to assume. Sorry, but it is YOU who is showing your colours here
"Everyone" is reading your comments SW . Obama is making notes as we speak. Dang, the Dalai lama hangs out in this forum as well so he too is probably reading your comments and probably sent him into intercessionary prayer. Every online forum has a resident nutter. Ours is a pontificator.
awww, I was hoping the pope would read them, have some anger issues and a message for god. I'm on ignore and was told the pope has a direct line. Tried screaming at the clouds and not even a freaking lightning bolt.
Oh ok, so you were saying what was pointed out. Sorry to have said anything then. I realise your mate has no comprehension of what is displayed by their ignorant and unthinking comments, I just wondered if you were the same. Apparently you are. We saw the limit of thought and the launch of the bigotry and now the assumption of privacy due to YOUR lack of ability to understand who may or may not be reading your comment. Fair enough, when you get on a US political forum and announce that you cannot think for yourself, pretending you are an average Australian. Nobody should be allowed to say anything because YOU simply demonstrating the level of intellect Australian’s can reach... Good one there
Really??? I don't even know you, I just realise that your comments come from a place left by many years ago with the orientation of bigotry to focus them. What is amusing, I don't think the ALP/Greens coalition want to portray this type of sentiment as being their base. BUT hey, what am I to know, after all I do not represent the world... You know what youre want to say, just ashamed others do not...
EXACTLY you don't even know me... Sheez how long did that take you, talk about being slow Garry, you need to seek help, your other personality is making (*)(*)(*)(*) up, it's all lies Garry... the ALP and the Greens are going to get you
Do you really think I need to know you to interpret your comments??? Let us talk about being slow, do you still contend that I have taken offence due to your bigotry??? As from the start, I am simply pointing out your comment is less than flattering to YOU. In fact, your comments diminish any credibility YOU think you have as the point is made to interpretation. Going by YOUR logic, anything you say about the political scene in Australia is crap because YOU Don’t know them… If it was necessary to know you to discuss anything you say, I would suggest you’re actually in the wrong place. Again your attempt at insult and trying to find some semblance of protection of excuse for your own failure simple demonstrates far more of yourself.
Gary, nothing in your entire post nor the previous ones to me, is about anything political. They are entirely focussed on me and what you think you know about me, are you beginning to see why we're not having a meaningful discussion here.
Oh I am sorry but that is far from the truth and anybody who reads back will see such. You say I cannot interpret your comments because I do not know you. That is YOUR comment I addressed such by asking if you really believe such. My previous was to point out that you appeared to be happy to portray yourself as an ignorant and intolerant person and I was wrong to assume that was not the intention you wanted. I also apologised for my wrong assumption while your attempts at insult simply reinforced your intention to say such about yourself. Again based on YOUR comments ALL focused on your comments. I know I am not having a meaningful discussion here, I just wonder if YOU know what has been occurring here??? I think not. We were never going to have a meaningful discussion and I fear we will never have one in the future and that is because YOUR first response to my comment was filled with innuendo and personal attack. In fact EVERY comment you have made has been full of personal insults until this. So while you seem to consider that this forum is your place to launch insult at everybody just like the person you placate, others do not…
you just used "You" 18 times lol I still have no idea what your political stance is but obviously that's not what we're discussing here LOL
Darling I'm flattered, really it's not that your insults are particularly special... it's just you deliver them with such narrow focus
I think he either has trouble contextualising things or is a troll. Don't think he is a troll, he involves himself with way too much silly pedantic and endless nonsense. I don't think there is enough spark to light the fire TBO. Just saying. Well it's looking like labor are going to win and I think I might vote for the vixen running in my electorate. I'm only voting for her because she has a cute assssse. I'd like to know what her policies are but that's the least of my concerns.
and you talk about “being slow” I am glad you can count. Shame you lack comprehension skills. For starters when you count "YOU", I would not consider you would count "YOURSELF" "YOUR" or "YOU'RE" differently. As there meaning different things. As for my political stance, as I was simply pointing out that your original comment has credibility destroying interpretation and portrays many unflattering things. Now I did apologise about making an assumption of what you wish not to portray and had you made that clear from the start this would have ended hours ago. I am sure you’re not getting my political stance. It is interesting, that from the very start, you attacked without the understanding about what people are saying. Even to this point, you simply don’t comprehend what people are saying to you.
I think it's more a case of ... Again over your head now I understand your desperate need for my attention Garry but I have a life so you're on your own... but then again, I see you've already picked out your next victim.