Not sure if you're trying to make a point with that phrase. Most pro-white dissidents define "white" as of European descent. A supreme court decision from about a hundred years ago used the same basic definition. White means of European descent, not Caucasians in general which would include middle eastern semites and South Asian, maybe even aboriginal Australians, who have some ancient Caucasian traits. What is happening now is not comparable to the casual mixing of brown eyed and blue eyed Europeans. The white genocide is a plan pushed (usually quietly for obvious reasons) by academics. Two of the most strident supporters of white genocide are the college lecturer Tim Wise and the Ivy league professor Noel Ignatiev. White genocide is supported by many liberals for reasons of the liberal personality type. This kind of white liberal genocide-supporters are emotionally similar to what Gene Kirkpatric used to call the "Blame America First crowd". Beyond academia the biggest support for the white genocide comes from greedy business people who want wage busting immigrant labor. The current white genocide is a deliberate program, and such is punishable under the U.N. convention on genocide.
Threads such as this are proof positive that some of us are a long way from being fully evolved and functional, too bad they have not realized that they would be far happier on a site such as StormFront were they can slap backs with their fellow regressives instead of a site where people will view them as nothing more than paranoid nut jobs best ridiculed or ignored
To Bob Whitakers list of the total of five anti-whites arguments I would add a sixth. "You (pro-white dissidents) are paranoid, stupid or just plain evil. "
You do talk some rubbish. It is simply a choice made by people who decide not to live in a particular area, you have no idea what genocide is or means. no one is forcing white people not to give birth no one is forcing white people to move to other areas This is just something you have dreamt up to justify your ideology and agenda.
The burden of proof is upon the one that made the initial claim. Shifting the burden of proof to me is a logical fallacy and shows me that the claimant cannot defend their position.
But uncontrolled one way massive immigration to White nations is creating conditions of life which will have the effect of reducing the indigenous birth rate and promote flight, which is genocide under UN law. You don't need to directly force people to not have children or move away for it to be considered genocide. Just to create a hostile environment which has that effect. I think we can all agree that filling the hometown of a White with Third Worlders is going to have that effect.
Some day when my war is over I'll have time. Tempting. Most of my reading now is John LeCarre novels. My CIA brother in law told me that's how the espionage culture is passed generation to generation, reading spy novels that is. See also youtube "Three Days of the Condor" - "I just read books" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7-rpI0RrQU
Cool. Last month I did a marathon of the Alec Guinness versions of Tinker Tailor and Smiley's People.
so what your saying is white people need to start acting like rabbits and have many many kids pre and post marriage that we need to stop parents from teaching abstinence as they are destroying the white race? we could start by legalizing ecstasy....... if chicken little says the sky is falling, we must all act now .
There are so many ethnic lobbying groups in the US and the white genocide group based in the South is not so different from Arab American or Korean American groups, which are borderline racist. These groups tend to make exaggerated claims to gain attention and promote their causes by disseminating half-truths.
Europeans breed responsibly and of course the solution isn't to reduce ourselves to the level of Third Worlders. It's to deport them. - - - Updated - - - You might find this amusing http://klownisms.wordpress.com/2014/01/26/comfort-women/
No of course not it would be more complex than that. Also a system of concentration camps with an option to leave the country would be a good staging point.
Colonialism often benefited the colonised in many ways and Korea was no exception. Korea could not have been an industrialised country as it is now without being ruled by Imperial Japan which transformed Korea into a modern state. Japan was the only non-Western country which modernised itself to the European level and the Korean economy expanded substantially under Japanese colonial rule as Japan introduced modern institutions to Korea and invested heavily in infrastructure by spending Japanese taxpayers' money. But because it's illegal to make any pro-Japanese statements in Korea, these historical facts are often overlooked.
Tell me again about how great those White Europeans are? Germany initiated the events of both WWI and WW2 and thus was responsible in no small measure for the deaths of over 80 million individuals. They have a helluva lot of explaining to do, quite frankly why the World should care if they go extinct. The Anglo-Saxons have been a menace since the collapse of the Roman Empire, let alone the 20th Century. Superior breeding indeed.
What stake do white people have in the continued survival of the "white race"? In what ways would the non-violent cessation of the "white race" negatively impact white people? I've never heard a white nationalist give satisfactory answers to these questions, but I'll let them try again.
