Marrs proves that Oswald not only did not Kill Kennedy,but did not kill Tippet as wel

okay just like i predicted two months ago,soon as the week of the JFK assassination came up,I predicted back then there would be government paid shills coming here to this section in droves posing their lies and bullshilt that oswadl was the lone assassin.so many of them have made threads psoting their lies Im not going to play their game and give them the attention they seek anymore.

Myself and a few others have debunked their lies and ramblings over and over again and I just end up having to repeat the same thing over and over again.Im not going to do that anymore.

Thats what they want,they want to waste your time. Im just going to post facts and the ones that come here and keep oosing thier lies and b.sthey will just be wasting their time cause im not going to play their game and reply to them anymore,so all you paid shills coming on here,can just go ahead and talk to yourselfs.Im hitting the ignore button.

the ones that are objective,and open minded like brother jonathan for instance,you can talk about my facts I post if you want,but i strongly suggest you dont waste anymore time with all these paid shills anymore.thats what they want you to do.

 

"Crossfire: The Plot That Killed Kennedy" by Jim Marrs gets good reviews at Amazon

 

Watch "Executive Action"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BbF5him-EF8

 

I did not know that movie was on youtube.i saw that years ago on late night tv once and had not seen it again till recently when I just bought it at a video store the other day.It was more expensive than your average older movie because there were very few copies made of the film because it got pulled from theaters very shortly after the film was made.the government was worried too many people would catch on like they did with JFK.

by the way,take my advise,all these people defending the lies that oswald did it are paid shills that have penetrated this site,dont argue with them,you end up repeating the same thing over and over again just to watch them ignore it and thn they go and lie saying they have debunked you.they are just here to waste your time,dont play their game.

 

Video store ... Right.

 

If he sees it on TV it is truth

 

the magic bullet theorists at this thread have obviously never read the book since they know it shoots down their laughable lies that oswald did it.

 

I read it and no it does not just as you consistently fail to refute any facts presented.

But you do still believe the magic bulle theory

 

matter of fact as they well know,they have NEVER read an opposing viewpoint of a book like Marrs books.just the warren commission,case closed by posner,and a few others that toot the lies of the warren commission.

 

I have read more of these books than you on both sides.

Marrs books are proven fiction which you would know if you had read them.

 

I could go on for page after page about the lies and falsehoods in Jim Marrs books but to prove how wrong you are I will just throw out this one for starters.

In the preface of his book on page vii he asks " Do you believe government experts who state that a man reputed to be a bad shot could take a bolt action rifle that wholesaled for three dollars and twice hit a man in a moving car at more than two hundred yards with three shots in less than six seconds ? "

Straight from the book's preface and two false hoods exist even before the main body of the book is begun.

Oswald was NOT reputed to be a bad shot he was a U.S. Marine and the Marine corps has the best basic marksmanship training program in the U.S. military. Even a poor shot in the Marine corps is a good shot compared to the general population most of whom have never fired a rifle. Furthermore even by Marine Corps standards Oswald was not a bad shot but in fact an average shot. Oswald's record from basic training clearly and irrefutably shows he obtained the rank of sharpshooter which is the middle rank for the Marine corps. Before being discharged from the marines his performance slipped some but he still scored high in the marksman level of ability. Only one person testified that he had a reputation as a bad shot and that individual served in the same company as Oswald but in a different platoon which indicates he likely had little or no contact or knowledge of Oswald. Within the Marines those who know you best are your platoon mates. Oswald's actual platoon mates never stated he was a bad shot.

In addition Marrs makes a huge error which can only be viewed as an outright lie when he claims the shots were fired at a car more than two hundred yards away. All three shots were fired at a moving car LESS than 100 yards from Oswald's nest in the Texas School Book depository. This fact is long since proven and easy to verify. The murder was captured on film and from that we know exactly where Kennedy was at when the bullet hit his head. In fact in Dealey plaza today there is an X painted on the street where the head shot occurred. A line drawn from that X to the window Oswald fired from is 88 yards and the head shot was the LAST shot fired. Since the limo was driving away from Oswald the other shots were closer.

All of these facts are very basic and easy to prove but Marrs ignores them and then lies because the facts do not supprot his theory.

Of course as stated this is only the start of his falsehoods and is found in the preface.

The rest of his silly tome continues with the same theme of ignoring and lying about facts so build a theory with no supporting evidence.

 

Why don't you read the testimony of the people who testified in front of the Warren Commission? People who testified in front of the Warren Commission. Folks do not believe the debunkers. Read the testimony for yourself.

 

I have read them and the rest of the Warren Commission as well in fact i have quoted them to you on other threads.

They do not support a conspiracy

 

I Read it. You're wrong. No evidence of a conspiracy.

 

How stupid can people get? How stupid indeed? The testimony of the Warren Commission is available for anyone to read for themselves: http://jfkassassination.net/russ/testimony/

 

Yes it is and you never read it.

Those who have find no evidence of a conspiracy.

This is why conspiracy theorists such as Jim Marrs can lie and misquote and even claim testimony was omited. Few will bother to fact check the testimony and discover that it is the CTers who are lying and omiting.

 

they always say no evidence of conspiracy because they always prove in spades they only see what they WANT to see.I m sure he read it,but just the parts he wanted to see though.they only read stuff that supports the magic bullet theory,they wont read books that shread to pieces the warren commission like Marrs book for instance or watch the JFK/BUSH connection since they dont want to see all the photos in that video that show proof of multiple shooters.hee hee.

 

Uh wrong it was in fact Marrs which was shredded not the Warren COmmission report I gave you page and direct quote which you ignore.

Marrs is a fraud leading lemmings like you in circles.

That is proven fact.

 

What lie or mis-quote from Jim Mars? Still waiting for lie and misquote in Lifton's "Best Evidence" book.

(Crickets Chirping)

 

Marrs lies and misquotes many people many times.

I already gave a proven glaring example in post # 86 of this thread. Go back and read it as I advised you to do from the start.

I never specifically claimed Lifton misquoted anyone althought his hair brained theories have been proven false.

 

His theories have never been proven false by you or anyone else.

 

Yes they have in fact.

 

Yes, the back of the head was blasted out from the shot over the right eye.

 

There was no shot which hit over the right eye.

 

There was no shot over the right eye and your photograph proves it because there is no bullet hole in it