Mentioning George Soros Is 'Verboten' On FOX

Ah yes, what money can do. It can even silence Newt Gingrich on FOX, and silencing Newt from telling the truth to the American people is not an easy thing to do. He was silenced by a Fox News host and a former CIA spokesperson when he mentioned that George Soros funded the 'progressive' candidates for prosecutors in the riot-struck cities.

“The number one problem in almost all the cities is George Soros-elected, left-wing, anti-police, pro-criminal district attorneys who refuse to keep people locked up,” Gingrich told the hosts of ‘Outnumbered’ on Wednesday.

“Both [Kamala] Harris and [Joe] Biden have talked very proudly about what they call progressive district attorneys,” he continued. “Progressive district attorneys are anti-police, pro-criminal, and overwhelmingly elected with George Soros’ money. They are a major cause of the violence we are seeing because they keep putting the violent criminals back on the street.”

Mainstream US media outlets openly reported that at the time, presenting the spending spree as a noble effort by the Hungarian-born Democrat mega-donor to “reform” the US justice system from the ground up.​

Here's the reality that can't be mentioned - or at least not to the American people. Censorship anyone?

https://twitter.com/robbystarbuck/s...ww.rt.com/usa/500892-gingrich-soros-fox-news/



https://www.rt.com/usa/500892-gingrich-soros-fox-news/

 

Melbourne has the same problem... criminals being let out almost immediately, we've also signed up to Belt & Road with a Premier refusing to budge & in the midst of the strongest lockdown in the world - private sector destroyed and apparently "conspiracy theorists" will now also be arrested... how many times can I say Soros without actually having used his name

 

Thank God for Trump. It's over for Soros after the election when Trump wins.

 

Yet the greatest conspiracy theory was the Russiagate, and it cost the US time and money, but the media was okay with that.

 

I'm not too sure of that. The Democrats were given orders by Clinton and Gore not to accept the election results. We might be in for a civil war - either way.

 

Oh, this is one of those looney tune threads.

 

There are studies into the influence of NGO's on Judges....seems science & research are looney only when it suits you. The NGO's funded by George Soros goes deep into political, educational and many other organisations in our societies... including Black lives matter & Antifa

http://static.eclj.org/pdf/ECLJ+Rep...+of+the+ECHR,+2009+-+2019,+February+2020.pdf?
]
NGOs and the Judges of the ECHR 2009 – 2019

 

My give a damn seems busted.

Was there a point in there? I should let you know that a long, long time ago I was a member of HRW. I would have less than no trouble if they got one of theirs on the court.

You want to look into something actually bad, look into the Koch nightmare.

 

is that an admission to corruption?

 

I'll give you points for consistency.

Seriously, the Soros paranoia is just plain dumb.

 

... and that flies in the face of the report I just posted... along with a myriad of evidence on the funding efforts from Soros via Open Societies that filters through an entire network of influence. Influence used to overthrow governments, establish control and 100% of the time lead to corruption and massive inequality

btw in South Africa's case it also leads to genocide.... should he be in the Hague? I believe so

ps. of course the irony is the judges are so corrupt they'll let him go

 

What I think Murdoch is doing is trying to move away from the conspiracy theory narrative that is being used to describe Fox news, and the central CT floating around these days is that it's SOROS behind all that is evil in the world.

I see guys like Gingrich, claiming Soros, but where is the evidence? Without evidence, it comes off as CT nonsense, and I think Murdoch is trying to push back on the narrative being ascribed to Fox. However, he can try, but that horse is already left the barn.

 

Your report didn't say a damn thing. Not the part you posted.

Now you are throwing around a lot of accusations, but they are absurd, paranoid, and simply wrong.

 

So how does sorus gain from spending money? What is his motive? Justice? Or somehow this benefits him and wealth?

Do rich people crave the power wealth can buy?

What's the deal?

 

The whole Democrat Party and all those tentacle organizations need to be brought up on RICO charges.

 

The whole Republican Party and all of those tentacle organizations need to be brought up on RICO charges.

 

Newt Gingrich was never one to let reality get in the way of anything that might get him a bounce in right wing media.

 

Soros is not welcomed in many countries. I guess you would call it national 'paranoia'. His major distinction is that; he is the only person in the world who carries on his own foreign policy. His means are: CHAOS, CHAOS, and more CHAOS.

1. Poland
2. Turkey
3. Russia
4. Hungary
5. Philippines
6. Macedonia
7. Egypt
8. Austria
9. Pakistan
10. Isrrael
11. Croatia
12. Slovakia

Here's a nice article going back to 2012. It tells of Soros' achievements:

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/george-soros-the-rich-man-who-is-hated-around-the-world

 

That's the same mantra.

Some of it is dumb and fake, some of it from countries that just want to get on with being nasty, you get the picture.

He spent a substantial amount of money sending lawyers, business experts, etc, as part of the failed effort to civilise Russia. Lost cause... but that was an incredible effort.

https://www.opensocietyfoundations....-the-fall-of-communism-in-europe-20191106.pdf

He'd be the first to admit he's made mistakes, but the paranoiac hallucinations are impossible to take seriously.

 

did they sign an NDA

 

First of all, when wealthy people create Foundations it's so their children will avoid inheritance taxes. So in a sense, George Soros' 'Open Society Foundation' is funding liberal organization with money that would normally go to our government. But he's not the only one, look at what Bill Gates funds?

George Soros is an ideologue in the order of Lenin. He believes in a one world government and wants to eliminate national identities and/or anything pertaining to national identities such as one's faith, heritage, standards, etc.

The problem with ideologues is that they believe the end justifies the means. Of course they see themselves as the decisive factor on what the end should be. But how can anyone who is indifferent to human suffering and how many lives are lost in order to create their 'utopia' be the decisive factor on what is right for humanity? Wouldn't that be an oxymoron?

As for me, I see any controlling factor such as a world government, as an enslavement of humanity.

 

Gingrich. Wasn't he disgraces 2 decades ago?

 

FOX is no better than MSNBCNN. They just flavor their propaganda and censorship poison with right wing spice instead of left wing spice.

Turn it all off.

 

Oh yes, the criminals who were stealing Russia's wealth and sending it to outside sources while the Russians went hungry, are the civilized ones? You're joking of course.

We're civilized, we're civilized
it's what we be.
And that's the reason we agree,
that both of us should steal from thee - Jeannette


​

 

Also over for Democracy and freedom, which is why Trump must not win, and won't.

Pull your heads out of your behinds Trumpers. There are other things in the world besides race and the hatred of people you don't like