Muslim Areas in London

before Shangrila steps in and deletes my post!

Go back to the first opening post.
Then read the title of the video that was posted.
Then once you have done that you will see the connection to the post of mine.

or maybe not......................

- - - Updated - - -

thank you

at least someone is paying attention

 

too short or too tight shorts?

 

As I said, ask me about a particular event that you're curious about, and I'll provide you with the link to the British newspaper that originally published it. Why do you care about my source that went into a trouble, compiling all the multicultural British news?

 

Or the Daily Mail-much the same thing, really.

 

Ah yes, the Mail. Probably the furthest right-leaning of all our papers, and well known for lying, misleading and distorting the truth for the ditto-head idiot right-wingers to devour.

 

Since you're unable to refute the message itself, it's only natural to call the messenger a Nazi, an Islamophobe, a Zionist, whatever other epitets you use to describe someone shedding the light on religion of peace. It's all right; we understand

 

Neither. Its just that ordinary folk who don't belong there shouldn't feel like they can just pass through.

 

Are you serious? A quick Google search will reveal that the only places where this piece of 'news' item appears on are some blogs/forums, including jihad-watch (I thought all they talked about was Islamic terrorism!).

 

*shrug You must try harder and be more thorough when searching Google - here's another source for just one of the events I complied - about a cute Scottish police puppy and the uproar he caused among muslims

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/222...py-police-advert-after-Muslim-complaints.html

 

Would this be a better source for yea?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...Islamic-and-have-no-place-in-our-society.html

 

I was referring to the list rather than individual items. Since you mention the Daily Heil...

"... Lord Rothermere was a friend of Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler, and directed the Mail's editorial stance towards them in the 1930s.[31][32] Rothermere's 1933 leader "Youth Triumphant" praised the new Nazi regime's accomplishments, and was subsequently used as propaganda by them.[33] In it, Rothermere predicted that "The minor misdeeds of individual Nazis would be submerged by the immense benefits the new regime is already bestowing upon Germany". Journalist John Simpson, in a book on journalism, suggested that Rothermere was referring to the violence against Jews and Communists rather than the detention of political prisoners.[34]
Rothermere and the Mail were also editorially sympathetic to Oswald Mosley and the British Union of Fascists.[35] Rothermere wrote an article entitled "Hurrah for the Blackshirts" in January 1934, praising Mosley for his "sound, commonsense, Conservative doctrine".[36] This support ended after violence at a BUF rally in Kensington Olympia later that year.[37] ... "

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

 

Good of you to post a video of a Muslim saying how wrong the two men were. Something tells me you did not bother to read or watch it.......

 

No you don't understand. If you lived in Britain you would understand that the Mail is treated as a bit of a joke by anyone with the brains to be able to discern right-wing propaganda from serious journalism.
http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Daily_Mail

 

But it is you who don't understand. I did not quote the Mail; I quoted The Telegraph.

 

It said : Shaykh Ibrahim Mogra from The Muslim Council of Britain said: "This idea of Muslim Patrol, has no room in our society whatsoever. I found the video to be very intolerant. All of it was very un-Islamic.


To me that implies that the overwhelming majority muslims in this country would disasociate themselves from that bunch of crapheads, just as I hope , you would not approve of race or ethic - Latino no go areas in wherever WOT Colorado ?

.. btw - I'm told there are many predominately Black neighbourhoods in US cities where no White face would dare show itself , after dark. Is that true ?

.. Wherever there are people there are problems.

..

 

Those aren't even real Muslim's in the video. They're probably just (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*) bags impersonating Muslims.

.

 

Well what about the event of changing the directions of the toilet seat so it won't face Mecca.

The two articles (from the Daily Mail and Telegraph) concerning the event are almost exactly the same-

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...lets-turn-away-Mecca-respect-Islamic-law.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...2012-Olympic-toilets-will-not-face-Mecca.html

Quite the reputable source you have there. Do you have something legit to offer us?

 

Well, if that is indeed the case that the Mail's origins comes from people who hate Jews, then indeed that give it MORE cred with the World Events regulars!

 

Aha! So left wing propaganda is okay... like for instance the BBC? How do the British feel then when the BBC is caught lying? Do they hang their heads in shame, or curse the right wingers for catching them.. .and even having the nerve to make it an issue.

I mean really, what's wrong with lying as long as you're forwarding the right agenda...and after all who would know what's the right agenda other than the brilliant of the brilliant: The liberal elites of Britain. Hmmm! Seems I recall someone named Aristotle who said; 'wisdom begins when we realize how little we know.' But that's okay, what did he know, he was only some stupid Greek that lived years ago...and we all know they're a bunch of lazy crooks who do nothing but party all day.

 

What the Shaykh said can't be believed as long as Muslims practice the Islamic art of 'taqiyya'. What would be believed though, and accepted by non Muslims is if the Shaykh issued a fatwah towards anyone committing an intolerant act or an act of violence towards a non Muslim. How about it Shaykhee boy, show us you are serious?

 

We've had some great news over the last few days that crime in Britain is falling. It must have something to do with the muslims swamping our towns and cities.

 

I should think the Muslims on this thread, would have the courtesy to let us know if they were facing Mecca or not?

 

I was actually curious if anyone downloaded the app I found or already uses it. It sounds like something a serious Muslim would find very useful.

You know, I was thinking about using a variation of this for a homework assignment. The question, or some offshoot of it being: You live in Los Angeles, and want to face directly towards Mecca. How far off would you be if you were facing one degree away from it?

 

It probably does have something to do with the Muslims controlling those areas, since shariah laws would be respected more by the Muslims themselves. Is it worth though to have those areas controlled by Muslims, if by doing so, they are not under British jurisdiction and therefore not really a part of Britain? Shouldn't this then be seen as an Islamic invasion?

 

It's not unique to London. There are also "no-go" areas in the United States... parts of Los Angeles, Chicago, and Detroit. They are ethnic enclaves racked with all sorts of urban poverty social problems.
Actually, Compton and the "East side" in Los Angeles are not really as bad as they used to be in terms of safety. People are reluctant to leave their cars out on the street because they will get broken into, and women do not go out alone at night because of the street robberies. In the 1980's however, certain ethnicities did not dare venture into Compton. Hari Krishna and Mormon missionaries were routinely attacked.

There are also the barrios in Rio de Janeiro (Brazil). This one is not really a "no-go" area, but it is plagued with gun violence (even though Brazil has very strict gun control laws).