Newt Gingrich actually gets it

I am quite certain the irony and hypocrisy of your vast pile of leftist bile escapes you.

Did you come on here just to troll the thread with your inane rhetoric? Substance has never been the forte' of the left which is why the morons that represent you can keep getting elected.

So cheating on wives is a "right wing" deal? I guess we need to conveniently forget about Clinton, Edwards, Spitzer and on and on.

But in the hypocritical lunatic realm of leftists and their media double standards, it's okay when their guys do it right?

Once again you are confused and wrong; but this is par for the course. The Conservative message has been quite stable and has carried for centuries. What part of freedom, liberty, and small government do you find so horrible?

One thing we can say for the leftists, they can always shift their message to sound like Conservatives, cheat on their wives and spend us into oblivion because they can claim that at least they are not hypocrites; they never espouse common sense of morality.

Carry on; I cannot say I look forward to more of your ineffectual trolling on the thread. Netherlands has no military to speak of and is a nation that is desperately trying to deal with an influx immigrants that are needed to supplant the declining Dutch population.

 

I agree; better than any of the other candidates. Can you imagine Perry in a debate with Obama and then having a "brain fart?" It would kill Republican chances.

 

As opposed to Edwards whose wife eventually succumbed to cancer and whom got the OTHER woman pregnant. But since when does the lunatic left give a crap about reality or the facts?

And let's not forget the equally egregious hypocrisy on the left when the lamestream media refuse to do the story because a tabloid scooped them and basically attacked the tabloid until the truth became inescapable.

The leftists of the world are a despicable cadre of liars, cheats and losers who infest the lands politics with their ignorance on a daily basis. Sorry if I digress, but many disgust me beyond reproach when they engage in such asinine tactics. I fell the same for anyone on the right who would engage in similar tactics but they are fewer and far between.

 

I am not sure it would be interesting; watching someone get massacred with facts would require our sympathy for the dolt on the other side.

I would love to see Obama and Newt get into a Constitutional debate; Newt would mop the floors with him.

 

And what do Democrats represent, the immoral minority? I think I will take the former. Troll on lefty.

How does one refute a false asinine claim based on nothing more than "because you say so?"

 

So let me attempt to discern your farcical rhetoric; so you are claiming that someone who runs on family values cannot do so if he has committed adultery?

Why is that? But in addition to your laughably stupid claims, you are also suggesting that someone who does not run on moral values is a better candidate and can do whatever he/she pleases? REALLY?

I find the leftist claims and arguments to be less than repugnant when it is nothing more than an attempt to defame good people with crass claims and avoid the massive failure that represents leftist ideology.

Your kidding me right; you are going to vote for this ineffectual President who has buried us into a massive additional $4 trillion debt in three short years, a massive deficit of $1.5 trillion, a massive loan for a failed solar company of half a trillion all while poverty increases and unemployment among blacks are at an all-time high?

The notion that ANYONE isn't better than the current butt clowns who are running things requires the willful suspension of common sense.

But alas, you are a testimony of how morons like Obama, Pelosi, Reid and Waters get elected and re-elected.

I am always amused when leftists are concerned about raising taxes, high unemployment and deficits; but only when they are no longer in power.

 

If you are going to troll the thread with your claim that Newt is a scumbag, why don't you at least attempt a rational coherent debate on it and provide some examples; your first claim was an outright lie, why don't we start there?

 

How so?

Ron Paul has taken some idiot positions and will never get nominated or elected; why continue to beat the drum for someone who could never lead this greatest nation on earth and whose candidacy as an independent would just guarantee morons like Obama getting re-elected?

".....because you say so." Do you have anything substantive to add or should we just take you at your word because you have a superiority complex?

I am always amazed how Ron Paul supporters sound so much like the whacko left; why is that?

 

Perhaps you would prefer we endorse that scumbag Obama, who embraced terrorist Bill Ayers, took financial favors from slumlord and convicted crook Tony Rezko ......... you know, the Obama you spoke out against .... oh wait ....

 

Understand that the left is in full blown attack mode right now. Their leaders have screwed this country up so badly, and have an abysmal record to run on, that a campaign of character assassination is literally their only chance of getting reelected. You have to keep this in mind when one of these leftists trolls a thread like this. They are simply doing the only thing they can for survival.

Think of them like animals. When an animal is beaten up and bloodied, like the left has been over these past several years, when they are cornered (in this case, by reality), they lash out and do whatever they need to in order to survive. You don't blame the animals for trying to stay alive.

 

Do you have any specifics or is this just another take your word for it because you say so?

In addition, can you provide me with any substantive examples of Obama's, or any Democrats for that matter, consistency and how he doesn't speak to the idiot “sheeple” who elected him and will probably vote for him again?

 

You are 100% correct in your analogy.

 

Remember Bill Clinton? The Adulterer in Chief put our country through 2 years of impeachments and the leftists have the audacity to say conservatives who are divorced cannot hold office because of family values?

He lost his scalpel he was gonna take to the federal budget.

 

Thanks for the video.

Wasnt this politician of yours also present during all these years of encouraging both borrowing and spending and both falling wages and income inequality growth that he rails against?

Shouldnt he tone down the rhetoric against secular socialists in american politics? WOuldnt that help him reach more people? Or are you content tohave him speak this about so many decent americans?

 

TD;

　
　
Good lord one week he's we have to intervene in Libya and the next week he is I would never have done that. The man will tell you anything you want to hear so heaven forbid you don't vote for him. Isn't that how we got Obummer?

　
　
Why would I do that, I never mentioned Obummer? That is your straw man.

 

The difference is Bill didnt run on that platform.

Hmm are you one of those that thinks the stimulus has prolonged the USs low growth?

 

Newt was in - the CENTER - w/ Breit Bauer the other night.That is
where a candidate sits in-between the regular 3 journalist panel and
fields their questions.The last question Newt got was about his
personal baggage and a certain claim.Newt handled it calmy and
with dignity.He said what he said before about being remorseful and
asking God for forgiveness and even changing Religion { he became
a Catholic }.That approach I think even further ruffled the feathers of those
out to destroy him.Anywho Newt added something I need to research.
That being a claim that was wielded over his head,that he said was
false.He may have said Patently Untrue.And that his one daughter
who has some sort of Column wrote a piece regarding that false claim
almost in detail.It may have been the claim about Newt doing something
seflish and tawdry while his first wife was sick or dying in hospital.
So I need to check into that.I think it was the claim that spread like
wildfire and started all the rumormill over how snidely whiplash he is.
I need to read his daughters column on that matter.It may put to rest
a claim that was false to begin with and started the Gingrich as
Grinch who stole more than Christmas legend.

 

Some might say that a person that has such a delusional opinion of Newt Gingrich is himself an idiot or a scumbag.

But, one thing is clear: America will NEVER vote in a President who may have some valid insights in analyzing our failing economy ..... due to the Political Charlatan OwebamaCrapster ......but who is a TOTAL POLITICAL MORON when it comes to Foreign Policy.

Ron Paul's nigh INSANE notion is to APPEASE the FANATICALLY CRAZED ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE by kissing up to them......no matter what they do ..... as long as they don't attack us.

But, (and it's not necessary to go any further) there's at least a coupla things wrong with this Ron Paul INSANITY:

First,There isn't ANYTHING that ANYONE can do that will appease the Islamofascist Swine to not TOTALLY ANNIHILATE our Strategic Oil Interests in the Mid East.... Or, potentially ANNIHILATE our ONLY True Ally Israel in that SEWER PIT called the Mid East.......unless it is a CREDIBLE threat of force.

This is TOTALLY ignored by the Political Idiot Ron Paul .....because according to him .....that's honky dory ..... unless WE are attacked by them !!!

Well, the ACTUAL FACT is: Iran and the other IslamoFascist Swine have ALREADY attacked us FIRST in the UNDECLARED WAR we are waging, and have waged, the last FIVE YEARS, or so.

WTF do you think will happen if these Mid East Crazies can blackmail us, and the World when they have the nukes (Pakistan is another scenario) ? And, being the Crazed Fanatical Religious Whackjobs that they are, committed to The Historically Documented Nutjob Mohammed's FIRST DICTUM thus seeking to play the Russian Roulette of World destruction if their Agenda is not met ?!?!?

Second, There is ACTUAL PROOF that there isn't anything that can be done to appease this islamofascist Swine short of TOTAL CAPITULATION to their Agenda: Note the case of israel.

ISRAEL HAS BEEN IN 5 or 6 WARS OF TOTAL ANNIHILATION if it lost. However, in surviving, Israel, as any Non-insane Nation would.....created a reasonable buffer zone. ESPECIALLY since there have been, and are, DAILY THREATS as to it's very existence FOR DECADES !!!

WOULDN'T YOU DO THAT ?!?!?

Israel, has made numerous concessions to the islamoFascist Swine, with quite a few actual agreements....ALL of them broken within hours, or days.......with continuous suicide bombings of its innocents, women & children involved to punctuate their arrogance !

NOTHING SHORT OF THE TOTAL CAPITULATION OF ISRAEL, A RENUNCIATION OF ISRAEL AS A NATION.....WILL APPEASE THIS ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE!!!

Does The Political Idiot Ron Paul take this into consideration in trumpeting his Mid East INSANITY ???

Nope.... Ron Paul's AVOWED solution is to kiss up to these CRAZED & FANATICAL IslamoFascist Freaks a la Daniel Pearl.

D'you remember our Naive Liberal Journalist, Daniel Pearl, who trustingly placed himself in the hands of the Al Queda Leadership in the hopes of a CIVILIZED interchange and enlightening reportage that would show how maligned the IslamoFascist Swine are really like ???

Well, Daniel Pearl had his head chopped off. His decomposing body was found CHOPPED INTO TEN PIECES !!!

And, to show how INSANE the LIEberrhoids are .... his IDIOTIC FATHER (a Left Wing Academic) .....publicly, on National TV .....stated that he UNDERSTOOD the angst of The CRAZED & FANATICAL ISLAMOFASCIST SWINE......and FORGIVES THEM !!!

Did any of this impress our Political Idiot Rob Paul.....or, his equally moronic supporters ????

Nah......

 

I'm sorry but Newt has an almost Kinglike quality to heself.
Another plus for the guy.Obama at best looks like the skinny
kid on Bill Cosby's - Fat Albert -.

 

He didn't? So, liberals don't run on values at all? Do they run on infidelity?

 

Bill Clinton never saw a chick wearing platforms he couldn't
convince to help him smoke a cigar.

 

Yes they run on values, but not family values.

Whats the problem with that?

 

Newt is a neo-con who has already destroyed a conservative small government movement once. He's a CFR globalist, anti-sovereign scumbag, maybe more of a RINO than Romney. He is Bush, Clinton, Bush, Obama.

There's more:

 

Nice try Owebamarrhoid.

If not an Owebamarrhoidal, then one who is, by SMEARING Newt, realizing it or not, helping the Owebamarrhoidal scum.

 

I'm just calling it like I see it, maybe you fanboys should actually look into someone's history instead of listening to their lies.

SMEAR