Newt Gingrich actually gets it

Not only does Newt lie he looks likes a janitor , fat little hall monitor not very

Presidential .

 

With the exception of Huntsman... everyone on the panel was saying BOLD, stupid things.

The Republicans don't want the presidency because they don't know how to fix the problems either.

 

Seriously? I am a Ron Paul supporter. I applaud his plan to cut $1trillion and 5 agencies from the budget, and that is not over 10 years.

If we are going to make sweeping generalizations, let me offer one that is a bit more truthful. Those that bash Ron Paul usually have a distorted view of what actual liberty dictates. This just in, having a strategic plan for the future of other countries is not a very good approach to global politics. The authoritative collectivist style of Obama is as close to the exact opposite of Ron Paul as you can find.

 

Bingo we have a winner . I was talking with a customer the other day a real

conservative he said the same thing , but at the same time he would not

vote

for Obama so they will blindly follow who ever the nominee is . I told him to

stop watching Faux news he just laughed ( 75 years old at that )

 

You do know Huntsman is a Mormon ?
Led a Home field state that is more home field based upon RELIGION than any other state ? 80 % are MORMON..I doubt he would win in any other state.
You do know he is wrong on the China trade issue.. pandering and waiting 30 years for their youth uprising may not help us in the mean time.

If you rip Romney on wealth..you rip Huntsman.
If You cant stand a Mormon..you are a bigot.
If you are for The Obama policy in white..especially in trade..you have a Huntsman.

 

TD:

　
　
So you live in a fantasy world where reality is merely a concept?? Got it, oh and get a new handle TD that one doesn't suit you.
　
　

　
　
Seriously you demand specific facts (according to an acceptable source that I am sure if says anything you don't want to accept is automatically unreliable), then pretend you can assume as you wish?? Really??

 

Quote:
Do you have any specifics or is this just another take your word for it because you say so?

So in other words, you don’t have anything substantive; thank you for clarifying this.

Quote:
I should not assume that when you spam a thread with innuendo, you are not also defending the status quo?

Again by this answer you have nothing it is just because you say so; thank you for clarifying this.

Spamming a thread with BS is hardly a coherent debate tactic.

 

Thiis is why Liberals and all Democrats are mortified of Newt.
His argument is pure Americana.No flaws in logic,intent or
what the Founders created.There should be no question that
Obama prefers subects beholdin to a Big State.And the Newt wants
to reverse that idealogy.That the People should decide their destiny
not some State run beaurocrat.Yes,legislators create and make laws.
But at least a legislator is duly elected and beholdin to a constituency.
Obama Prefers to govern via Fiat.
That is why Liberals/Democrats have invested and gone to great
length to Boogeyman Gingrich.Because in the light of normal
America,Gingrich talks the talk.

 

Newt voted for the Mexican bailout, the Wall Street bailout and NAFTA.

 

March 7th 2011, he said he would exercise a no-fly zone immediately (this afternoon actually), because Obummer hadn’t done it yet, then on March 23rd after Obummer did what Newt wanted he suddenly changed his mind and said he would have implemented a no-fly zone. Excuse me the only thing I had wrong was it wasn’t one week it was two, my bad.
　
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/headlines/2011/03/newt-gingrich-flip-flop-on-libya-no-fly-zone-which-gingrich-do-you-agree-with/
　
　
Here you can watch it with your own two eyes TD;
　
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lZTAfrLh5g"]www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lZTAfrLh5g[/ame]
　
Of course you will not see it, it’s the way you have been programmed. Stick your fingers in your ear and go Lalalalalala....
　
Anyone with half a brain can see he doesn’t have a clue as to what the heck he is talking about, and doesn’t know if he is coming or going, only that whatever Obummer says/does he must say/do the opposite. The two party shuffle at it’s proverbial finest.
　
This is why you cannot discuss or debate if you will, with polar opposite, politically biased, partisan hacks or their beloved professional politicians from either party. They haven’t got a clue what is the right or wrong side of any issue, just stick to the talking points and if the other side declares something white, then it is obviously black. No need to state why or give a reasonable facsimile of logic or common sense, just say uh-huh and move on and don’t even bring up what they said yesterday or the day before.
　
The only BS being spewed here is this petty bickering and childish banter, suggesting something cannot be proven to your satisfaction. Of course it can’t, since you don’t want to accept reality. And that reality is neither party gives a rats arse about the greater good only that their corporate masters are pleased with them and their rhetoric to keep the peasants arguing while they continue to prosper.
　
You are not part of any solution. YOU continue to feed, nourish, and coddle, the problem, and the problem is the corporate owned two party system, and the best government corporate money can buy.

 

Of course he did , he is a good little professional politicians who serves his masters well. Always has been always will. Replacing a clown with a court jester does nothing to resolve the situation we as a nation have been imposed with due to the two party scheme.

 

Newt, as all the others, is just a talking head for the powers that be. The job has become nothing more than a public relations position. Thus the fact that there is no difference between the actions of either party.

 

Newt is quick on his feet and will say anything in the moment. His track record is NOT a secret.

 

There ya go not choosing a definitive side to the argument. Acknowledging that both parties are the problem doesn't play well with the accepted propaganda profile of appropriate debate tactics.
　
　
You are either with one of the dominating parties or for the other one. How dare you step out of line with the sheeple mentality and declare logic and common sense as a defense.

 

One of the reasons I have always paid close attention to Newt....he sees it as it is, and puts in plain English.

However, he will not win the nomination...partly because of that

 

Before one criticizes "I am for the 100% Gingrich" about anything, one must get the true measure of the man by what he says and how he says it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=qtjfMjjce2Y

And, compare that to the Monumental Mendacious Fraud, Commie/Socialist Racist, OwebamaCRAPSTER, and his speechifying whose agenda, and EVERY ITEM on the Agenda which resulted in the PRESENT IRREFUTABLE FINANCIAL DISASTER of our beloved Nation .....and PREDICTABLY WORSE if re-elected.

Admittedly, OwebamaCRAPSTER'S performed ONE service for America in that he whacked IslamoFascist Swine, the most important of whom, Bin Laden was offed only because of "Enhanced Interrogation" by the much denigrated Bush....and the technique that the OwebamaCRAPSTER consistently maligns.

And, of course, OwebamaCRAPSTER performed this service (against the yowling & howling of his base) because he had no choice for his re-election if he didn't.

 

Newt voted for the Mexican bailout, the Wall street bailout and NAFTA.

 

Different time line, circumstances, different necessities and, most importantly, different parameters.

Ex: A certain amount of STIMULUS was absolutely necessary to staunch the DISASTER brought on by the Dem Orchestrated Fannie & Freddie AT THE PARTICULAR TIME WHEN IT WAS ABUSED BY THE DEMS' unindicted CRIMINAL Chris Dodd, The Senate Finance Committee Honcho & The Despicable Bwarney Fwank, The House Committee Honcho ...... who in effect used F & F, willy-nilly, as their political plaything.

Thus, a "CERTAIN AMOUNT" of the Stimulus was a necessity recognized by BOTH parties.....but NOT the ridiculously IDIOTIC $1.5 TRILLION that the OwebamaCRAPSTER used as his PRIVATE FUND to reward the POLITICAL CRONIES who support him.

 

I would vote for Obama over Newt. He's the biggest hypocrite of all cheating on three wifes while attacking President Clinton on his oval office bj. He was President Clinton's biggest attacker. He's nothing but a fat, hypocritical blow-hard that is having you all just because he talks a good game. Talk about a right-wing fraud......

Stop and think and check back on his record and what he said about health care at the beginning of the year when his campaign was falling apart. Single payer anyone?

 

Rants by jilted ugly skanks venting their personal frustration don't count in a Political setting.

 

Fanni Mae paid Newt $300 K as an advisor....

 

I've got 'some' of Gingrich's record exposed in this thread http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/216617-real-newt-gingrich.html if you'll bother to look at it. He's a fraud with how he's trying to present himself these days and his record will bite him in the ass if he rises in the polls and becomes the next flavor of the week.

 

how can you support a man who wants to cut the dam CDC....

 

Newt is one helluva advisor.

It'be smart to have him on our side.

Correction: NOT ours ....I mean America's side.

 

Basically, Ron Paul is OK with his domestic policies. Not all .....but, generally speaking.

However, he is FLIPPIN INSANE when it comes to Foreign Policy.

Based on this Political Idiot Ron Paul's INSANITY, he should be GAGGED and tossed IMMEDIATELY into the nearest Looney Bin before he influences any more POLITICAL IDIOTS !!!