Obama : Called Bengahzi incident an act of terror.

The attack on Benghazi was over by 10 PM .. Washington DC time. He was back in DC and speaking from the Rose Garden the next day.. the 12th.

 

And your conclusion is? He could not have known it was a terrorist attack? If he was a community organizer-in-chief, probably, but Obama calls himself Commander-in-Chief, does not he? Its his job to know. What a joke he is...

 

I think they were trying to evaluate the situation and the risks...

To accuse Obama is like accusing Bush of doing nothing about 9-11..

 

Trying to evaluate the situation and the risks? How, on board Air-force One, in route to fundraiser in Las Vegas? Stop defending this schmendrick, Margot - he's not worth it.

 

We have enough people who do not care that the president denied effective, armed support to the defenders in Benghazi as long as they can continue to have their Obambucks, Obamaphones, food stamps and other welfare. These people must be defeated next week.

The one term Marxist, flexible with our enemies, apologist to Islamist radicals, president Barack Hussein "Peter" Obama withheld armed support. The result was Obama's Benghazi Massacre. Although the state-run media are ignoring the story it is not going away.

I agree with holding politicians accountable.

 

Therefore the president and his minions have no excuse. He could have met with the secretary of defense and his vice president, told them to keep the people safe and headed off to fund raising without even missing any beauty sleep. But he didn't. Instead he let the four Americans fight until they were finally all killed. Then they concocted the lies they would tell the American people for the next couple of weeks.

And he continues the lie by exclaiming that this is all under investigation. They may need months before the president actually knows what his role was and what he did or failed to do.

Obama's Benghazi Massacre is not going away.

 

What time did he leave for Vegas?

According to his schedule, he left for Vegas after the Rose Garden press conference on Sept. 12th.

 

Yes he did, and for the next two weeks he was "gathering and evaluating" information... in between the fundrasers. What a (*)(*)(*)(*)ing leader.

 

Alot of advance work goes into campaigning.. How could he just cancel? Meanwhile, he could communicate from AF One.

Do you think any president micro manages all intelligence gathering?

 

Obama asked to show his I.D to prove he is eligible to vote


Trump says they should have asked for his birth certificate

[video=youtube;44lUq3Tj0W4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=44lUq3Tj0W4[/video]

 

The same way he canceled after Hurricane Sandy.

He's the POTUS, for crissakes - he can cancel and reschedule any campaign appearance he wants to cancel...

 

Quick, Democrats!! They're suppressing Barry's vote!!!

 

I'm sorry I don't remember if this was a dream or what.. Did I just actually see somebody say it's okay that the president prioritizes campaigning over doing the job of president, finding out what went wrong with an obvious command loophole in the whitehouse, and addressing a deteriorating security situation in the middle east?

Like the guy's campaigner in chief, but in the event he's feeling up for it, he can moonlight as the president if he wants to.

 

If it were me sat there.. I'd have a look at his ID, then a look at his face, then look at the ID, then back at his face.. Then maybe elbow the girl sat next to me.. See what she thinks.. Then say..

"Sorry pal.. This doesn't look anything like you... NEXT!"

 

Imagine if he passes her his birth certificate.. She has a look at it, and says, "I'm sorry sir, this says 'Kenya' on it."

And he snatches it away and goes, "Oh sorry, my bad.. Here you go.. Hawaii.. This is the right one right here."

 

There seems to be a lot of that going around in certain circles lately, dude...

Funny, your comment echoes a crack Peggy Noonan once made about the Campaigner in Chief: "He could be president if he wants to"...

 

Relevence?

 

[video=youtube;znVqyfxfbRQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=znVqyfxfbRQ[/video]

 

Ship of tools...

 

Im amazed at the balls on obama.

How could he tell lies like that to the American people?

How could he fire admirals who wanted to help our Ambassador??

WTF is wrong with him?

 

Which admirals???

 

30 pages?

You guys still harping on that Benghazi thing?

You gave it the good ol' college try. It never took flight.

Perhaps it's time you go make up another reason to hate President Obama. This one didn't turn out that well for you guys. Who knows? Maybe next time you will get lucky.

If Romney wins the election Tuesday, all these faux-outraged people will probably never even mention Benghazi again. They're only doing it now trying to politicize these deaths hoping to get others to join in their hate for Obama. What an epic fail this has been.

 

Tuesday, October 30, 2012
The Full Story on Benghazi, our Military Response, Security, and Obama

If read the information below, you will understand that the emails sent from our Consulate in Benghazi had started our military response, orders were given to stand down, our military leaders tried to help anyway, and they have now been fired by Obama, or someone just below him.



“According to this report, yesterday (27 October) Obama ordered the immediate removal of Rear Admiral Charles M. Gaouette [photo 2nd left] from his command of the powerful Carrier Strike Group Three (CSG-3) [photo 3rd left] currently located in the Middle East.



CSG-3 is one of five US Navy carrier strike groups currently assigned to the US Pacific Fleet. US Navy carrier strike groups are employed in a variety of roles, which involve gaining and maintaining sea control and projecting power ashore, as well as projecting naval airpower ashore.



The aircraft carrier USS John C. Stennis (CVN-74) is the strike group's current flagship, and as of 2012, other units assigned to Carrier Strike Group Three include Carrier Air Wing Nine; the guided-missile cruisers USS Mobile Bay (CG-53) and USS Antietam (CG-54); and the ships of Destroyer Squadron 21, the guided-missile destroyers USS Wayne E. Meyer (DDG-10, USS Dewey (DDG-105), USS Kidd (DDG-100), and USS Milius (DDG-69).



US news reports on Obama’s unprecedented firing of a powerful US Navy Commander during wartime state that Admiral Gaouette’s removal was for “allegations of inappropriate leadership judgment” that arose during the strike group’s deployment to the Middle East.



This GRU report, however, states that Admiral Gaouette’s firing by President Obama was due to this strike force commander disobeying orders when he ordered his forces on 11 September to “assist and provide intelligence for” American military forces ordered into action by US Army General Carter Ham, who was then the commander of the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), against terrorist forces attacking the American Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.




General Ham had been in command of the initial 2011 US-NATO military intervention in Libya who, like Admiral Gaouette, was fired by Obama. And as we can, in part, read from US military insider accounts of this growing internal conflict between the White House and US Military leaders:



“The information I heard today was that General [Carter] Ham as head of Africom received the same e-mails the White House received requesting help/support as the attack was taking place. General Ham immediately had a rapid response unit ready and communicated to the Pentagon that he had a unit ready.

General Ham then received the order to stand down. His response was to screw it, he was going to help anyhow. Within 30 seconds to a minute after making the move to respond, his second in command apprehended General Ham and told him that he was now relieved of his command.”

Sourced from the Russian Intelligence Agency, Foreign Military Intelligence Main Directorate (GRU) of the General Staff of the Armed Forces, in the Kremlin today (Russia)
(50% of Russia’s spies have ONE job, to know everything the American government is doing and guessing why)

http://dyn.politico.com/members/forums/thread.cfm?catid=2&subcatid=7&threadid=7179985

 

Sounds to me like he answered your question. Any comment?

Also, I figured out the main reason Obama isnt saying anything anymore, or actually the secondary reason, first being to not be held accountable right before the election.

We all have seen new documents coming out daily. Im not sure if the WH is getting them in trickles also. But if there are still some documents that the WH hasnt seen yet, then if Obama was to give a complete detailed explanation, it might or might not be contradictory to any new documents that might come out after his explanation.

So he needs to wait until they are sure there are no more documents that will come to light before he gives his tale of lies.
And that date is established beyond the 7th of Nov., my guess is til the congressional hearing starts, the 15th.

 

obama is playing games with American lives so he can keep power.