Pedosexuality

Sorry about the formatting.

 

Imaginary harm isn't real harm.

So list these experiences that make you an expert. Support your claim.

You're not one to talk. You just claimed you have a "wealth of experience from the minds of these deviants." By which I assume you are referring to homosexuals. How do you have that? Do you read minds?

 

Your observations are filtered through a bias. So they aren't reliable.

Post data because your observations are anecdotal.

 

You are a poor example. You come from a dysfunctional home. There are functional homes with gay parents.

I'm sorry you went through that. But again you came from a broken home. A home with two parents regardless of sex that don't split up isn't a broken home so you're opinion is not a reflection of the subject

well it may just be imaginary so yes you can only imagine it.

 

It's taken 1500 years thus far and they are still not completely accepted.

The "play" won't work because again molesting children is known to cause harm. That will be the damning argument against them.

Why do you ignore this?

 

Given who you are, I doubt we can agree on anything so, I won't waste our time.

Let's just say I lived the Austin TX party scene for longer than I'd like to admit.

 

What does that have to do with anything?
You stated there are victims in a same sex relationship, name them.

 

Isn't any party scene a bad metric to judge anybody?

 

The children.

 

Perhaps. It did allow me to see into the lives of people and how they interacted.

Regardless, this thread was originally about Pedophiles. Not
sure I've ever known one.

 

No. What I said is that it was normal for teenaged girls to marry middle-aged men.

 

How do you figure?

 

I explained this in the up thread but, essentially, the lack of a father or mother in every SSM or relationship.

 

So, you're still talking about people in a party scene. If I looked at just the party scene of any poeple and picked some random trait they share could I them say it's representative of people that share that trait?

No it's about you not understanding how cases ate proven and attempting to say that there is a slippery slope that started with SSM and will end with pedophilia being legalized.

 

They aren't victims because they belong to a family that is structured in a way you don't like.

 

The impact on children by the lack of opposite sex parents is negligible. At least that is what seems to be the case by all possible parameters to measure it by.

 

From my experience of not having a father around, that's not true.

If you look at the children of single mothers in the Black community alone, the stats also say you are wrong.

 

Which is irrelevant.

It wouldn't give us any viable perspective on this at all. Homosexual couples aren't single parents.

You're trying to compare something that isn't analogous. Why be so dishonest?

 

Studies done on this matter disagree with you, your personal metrics in a broken heterosexual home do not equal a homosexual home with two loving parents. Furthermore not all homosexual unions result in children.

That has to do with lack of morality being taught and typically single parent homes do not have the time available that a child needs. Your argument is more against single parent homes than homosexual ones. The black homes also tend to be below poverty level with numerous children in the household while the the homosexual homes tend to be more upper class with a single to two children.

Your narrative is way off base, you are not even attempting to take into account the differences

 

Yeah two loving parents is certainly a terrible burden for those kids. Do straight parents teach their children to be straight? Do you think gay parents would "teach" their children to be "gay"?

 

Actually, in the DSM 5, they actually labeled pedophilia a sexual orientation.

 

They mislabeled it. Children aren't a sex.

 

Then so are you.

What if I told you I was in the study?

 

There's still a lack of a father or a mother. You can discount that [and pat yourself on your own pompous back] but, I doubt you have experience in any of this .

 

Not the point of this debate but, children tend to mimic what they see. The chance on them turning out Gay is higher, IMO.