runaway greenhouse effect?

Discussion in 'Science' started by cassandrabandra, Mar 26, 2012.

  1. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Its been posted by someone else...
    AGW is nothing but a political agenda.
     
  2. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,622
    Likes Received:
    74,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    cop out

    If you make a claim be prepared to back that claim

    I personally just love the way the "denialists" will not back claims - perhaps they are afraid if they actually check facts for themselves they might find their great god Alan Jones was lying to them
     
  3. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Oh you mean check facts like the IPCC did with the hockey stick graph?
    Or the polar bear saga
    or the melting ice cr@p
    and the list goes on and on.
    As I have said before...your religion of AGW is failing...
     
  4. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,622
    Likes Received:
    74,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Tell you what old thing I will bet you I can find WAAAAY more crap and lies in virtually ANY denialist website than you can find in the entire IPCC - want to take me up on that bet??

    Keep in mind that I have already proven that your vaunted climate gate was written and we think engineered (we are still looking for the person who illegally hacked those emails - some arrows point to Marc Morano author of many of the minority senate reports) by the SAME person caught lying blatantly about the 450/600/700 dissenting scientists
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113

    We? So you work for the IPCC?
     
  6. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The old "I must have read it somewhere" defense?

    How gullible do you think we are?
     
  7. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    All of your articles of faith have been refuted by science. The Hockey stick in particular has been reconfirmed more than once, the rest is poor reporting.
     
  8. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The Hockey Stick has been confirmed multiple times by multiple parties, including the National Academy of Sciences.

    Polar bear numbers are declining.

    Arctic sea ice is declining, and the decline is accelerating.
    Greenland is losing ice mass, and the loss is accelerating.
    Antarctica is losing ice mass, and the loss is accelerating.

    What "list"? So far, you're oh-for-three.

    Or perhaps I should have said: three-for-three as a liar.
     
  9. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113

    That's what happens when it warms. Doesn't prove AGW is the cause.
     
  10. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yet you ignored the link I gave for Hansen predictions that never happened
     
  11. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The poor reporting is you believing the lies when the hockey stick is proven false
     
  12. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There are four levels of climate denial, and efjay is still at level one. You're up to level two. So congratulations on being smarter than efjay. Now you can work on being as smart as the rest of us.
     
  13. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    We are smarter than you for we see the lies and data manipulation. You try to justify it but you always fail
     
  14. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yet oddly enough, you didn't see through the transparent lies and manipulation of the Daily Mail.
     
  15. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You don't see the lies and data manipulation of the IPCC and GISS and NASA and Anglia. Instead you try to defend it and justify it
     
  16. efjay

    efjay Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 27, 2011
    Messages:
    2,729
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48

    Thanks for admitting the IPCC is full of crap and lies.
     
  17. The Lepper

    The Lepper New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2011
    Messages:
    486
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ^^

    That's a no then? :D
     
  18. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    When temps don't rise 3C in 38 years you will be in big shock...

    Their calculations and models are useless until they can properly measure the heat output and change at from the core of the Earth and they can't. The recent changes in the magnetic field and increased seismic activity and volcanic action are signs of possible changes in the heating of the crust of the Earth and thus its oceans which transfer a lot of that heat to the surface.
     
  19. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If temps did rise 3° C in 38 years I would be shocked. The current rate of rise is about .17 C per decade.

    If that were true, then the oceans should be warming from the bottom up. They're not: the ocean surface is warming faster than the depths. So we know that the heat is coming from above, not from below.
     
  20. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,622
    Likes Received:
    74,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I didn't admit anything 1 is always more than 0

    Or has basic maths changed?
     
  21. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    92,622
    Likes Received:
    74,074
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Point out a deliberate lie - mistakes perhaps but outright lies - like to see them
     
  22. GrayMan

    GrayMan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,372
    Likes Received:
    3,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Water is a thermal conductor and when you include the ocean currents into the mix you will not see much change in the temperature in the lower part of the Ocean. You will see most of the heat increases where the thermal restriction exists. Since air is a thermal insulator, you will see increased heat at the surface of the water where the air slows the heat transfer from the oceans.
     
  23. ptif219

    ptif219 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2011
    Messages:
    10,299
    Likes Received:
    508
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Funny you claim deniers lie while you call GW propagandists lies mistakes. You show why you have no credibility or integrity
     
  24. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How would you know of such things? Did a cultist priest tell you, ye of too much faith?
     
  25. Poor Debater

    Poor Debater New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2011
    Messages:
    2,427
    Likes Received:
    38
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Sorry, but thermodynamics forbids heat from flowing from a cold place to a warmer place. The surface is warmer because that's where the heat is coming from.
     

Share This Page