Should Blacks Be Given Their Own Country Inside the US?

Let's take a look at Guinea and that economy...

 

I asked a black friend if they would prefer to have their own states. They have Atlanta which is actually thriving. He said to force them all in one place would make genocide too easy. That would be like putting all the Jews in one country so the neighbors can bomb them.

Many black people are afraid of going to the country just as many white folks are scared of some cities.

 

The point is that they have racial grievances that will never go away. They will always blame whites for any ills that afflict them, even if we do address every problem they have.

We aren't talking about forcing blacks to accept it; we are trying to entice them to support it, with great incentives.

Yes, the whites would have to give ground. They could accept an above-market valuation of their land and sell it to the US government, which would then give it to the new nation. The minority of whites who refused would be moved by force. Most likely, they would not want to stick around anyway.

Yes we would, but it would be worth it to both groups. This is a win-win situation.

 

What if they REFUSE the incentive? Drop the whole idea?


BTW, would Ben Carson and Clarence Thomas take the incentives???

 

They gun down leaders there. What do you mean by successful?

I exposed you to the CIA report on the economy there.

Here it is again

 

Not bad for a country that was an imperial colony less than 50 years ago.

 

If he was on a bus in 1954 Montgomery, Alabama....would he get to sit in the MIDDLE of the bus???

- - - Updated - - -

See question above.

 

I see, I disagreed with you so you figured I was a racist. Very tolerant and liberal of you. BRAVO!

 

Where would the government get this money for the "above market valuation" of the land and its payouts?

 

That black man alleges he has "ran" the country with republicans blocking him. If we blocked him, he could never run the country. Why do you link workers to any of his policies that only he instituted?

I know what he did for illegals. But tell me what he did for industry or business? Do you mean things like blocking Keystone pipeline?

 

How is it possibly supremacist to want to give Blacks their own country(even if a flawed idea?) This thread is indispensable in showing the state of affairs in America today. I don't believe our union is a long lasting one, at the present rate. I think its dissolution grows more certain with each passing year. I never could've imagined the state of affairs declining this quickly when I first warned of it in 2012.

 

If white racists want to enact such a policy....why do they hide in the shadows of anonymous blogs under pseudonyms.....

and not openly and publicly with full knowledge of their real names support such an idea?

 

If you want to call an ex-Spanish colony with less than a million population a success story, go ahead. Tell us about the dictatorship that runs it.

 

Do you disagree with post #11?

- - - Updated - - -

A dictatorship ran South Korea for decades. For some reason, it was considered a successful country.

 

1. What if they don't want to move? Would you make them?

2. This thread IS indispensible....it EXPOSES those who support such ideas. They can't hide behind "code phrases" and "hints" and the 1000 other ways they try to keep some "CYA" so that other Rightwingers won't denounce them....and they can continually try to claim "I never said that!".

 

Did I say South Korea was a successful country?

Post 11? Of course not, I posted it.

 

Let people starve? No. You just stop paying them to have more kids, which is what we currently do. With a voluntary IUD program, you could give impoverished women incentives not to reproduced, in addition to an IUD. It's cheaper than taking care of dysfunctional people later in life. Those already born would be taken care of.

Texas is a white and Hispanic state, so it would be highly impractical. Mississippi and Alabama are ideal because of the preexisting demographics and the quality of the land.

Do you think blacks would be satisfied with this? Not even close. Many of the libs on this very website have demanded reparations and a slew of other costly, racially biased programs.

So their main problem with the idea is that they don't think we will deal honestly with them?

Well, that is a beginning.

 

If blacks had their own country they'd have to pay for their own welfare, as to whether or not that would be equivalent to what our system is unknown...

 

It's primarily because Korea was a Japanese colony. The colonists laid the foundation for its economic development today. Otherwise, South Korea would have been a backward Asian country without major industries. As for the OP, blacks don't need their own country inside the US and it's Native Americans who should take back their country. African Americans are as foreign to America as British colonists.

 

We could get the U.N. to create something like Israel and allow disaffected Black from all over the world to return to their homeland and create an oasis of Blackness in equatorial Africa.

 

That's not the extent of their grievances, and you're well aware of that.

 

That's the majority of their grievances. There's always going to be lunatic fringe demanding more...just like Whites will always have to deal with "White Nationalists" proposing insane plans to ethnically cleanse the country.

 

Sure, if no one likes it, which I doubt would be the case, then we can drop the whole idea and come up with something else. A critical mass of people would have to accept the terms before it would go into effect, and they wouldn't automatically get both states, or even all of each, unless it was most of them. If half of them accepted, then they could have Alabama.

I think the federal government can handle it.

Because we know we will be viciously attacked and socially destroyed. Liberals control the media and the culture, and I'm not about to get myself in trouble and lose all of my friends over this.

 

Besides that, he was raised by only white parents.

 

They want reparations, who pays for it? They want "wealth equality", "income equality", "housing equality", "job equality" - they want to be on the same financial footing with other groups, and they want it to be given to them by Government. The left by and large supports these goals, and they would all harm other groups.