The BLM Movement is a Lie

I'm not sure. Can you cite it? Do the numbers compare to the amount of rape coming from African American men now?

What kind of question is that? Rape is wrong no matter the race.

 

In Progresso World, yes.

..more like a marxist revolutionary group intent on the destruction of America..

 

It's a legitimate question. Yes, rape is wrong no matter the race.

 

Well cite the rape percentages from white slave owners vs. the rape now African American men commit now.

Since you brought it up.

 

https://www.nationalreview.com/2019/05/american-colleges-segregated-housing-graduation-ceremonies/

You wanna try again?

 

its a valuable point.

what percent of rapes of black slaves was performed by black people and white people, in the USA?

 

If it's an actual point, then cite the numbers...

That's my only question.

If it's too difficult, just admit that you can't answer it. I'd like to examine the sources.

 

https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2018/crime-in-the-u.s.-2018/tables/table-43

You wanna try again?

 

Given that less than 2% of white Americans owned slaves, I’m going to guess that number was pretty small.

 

haha!!!! the National Review has been caught in a pathetic lie:

"These arrangements aren’t exclusive to private colleges. The American taxpayer subsidizes neo-segregation at Rutgers University in New Jersey, where Asian-American students can live in the “Asian American Identities and Images Living Learning Community.”

but meanwhile, at the college website:

Open to students affiliated with SAS, SEBS and RBS of all class years, including transfer students in good academic standing and must place into Basic Composition or higher for English testing. Students do not need to identify as Asian/Asian American in order to participate in the community.


let's see what other lies I find.

 

"Brown recently announced an Asian/Asian-American House will open in the fall."

and yet, the website says:

"Through an online Google Form application, the AAA program attracted interest from over 85 students, including international students from China, Hong Kong, the Philippines, Thailand and Korea, as well as some students from multiracial and non-Asian backgrounds, Zhang said."


look at all the lies I keep finding about so-called "segregated housing".

 

thats 182,000 slave owners.

thats a shitload of racist white slaveowners!!!

 

As far as black-only graduation ceremonies, I'd love to see the rules stating that if a non-black person shows up they will be arrested or removed.

LOLOLOL!!!!!!

 

How do you think that starts genius. And if we had white only graduations or white safe spaces or white dorms, as long as we let in a token black or Asian... that’s cool right? That’s not discrimination?

 

Far more violently criminal blacks But that’s cool right?

you do realize that out of nearly 600,000 incidences of violent felonies between whites and blacks, blacks are the perpetrators 90%... let me say that again... NINETY PERCENT of the time the black is the perpetrator in violent interracial felonies between whites and blacks.

 

Misleading, the rate was much higher in actual slave states. For instance, in Mississippi, 49% of families held slaves. Not to mention how even non slave holding whites benefited from a slave society, both in being of higher status than a specific population, and all hard labor being relegated to the slave population.

 

most crimes are not interracial in nature.

nice job finding something to get all panicked about.

 

The rate in slave states was 6%. 6% of the white southern population owned slaves at the height of slavery in 1860.

 

Yeah I mean who would think that 13% of our population committing 90% of the interracial violence is a problem. What could I be thinking that you might find that troublesome.

 

its pretty ****ing absurd and ignorant for you to compare this to the absolute oppression that whites did against Blacks during Jim Crow.

absurd, ignorant, dishonest and ****ing pathetic.

are whole white communities suffering due this??? are they unable to get a good college education? unable to get a home loan??? unable to vote??? unable to walk into many stores, theaters, hospitals, hotels???

shame on you.

 

And no sir. What is misleading is the dishonest use of the “household argument”. The rate of actual slave ownership was so pathetically low that your side has to artificially inflate the numbers by not just counting slaveowners, but impugning EVERYONE in the household, including infants, as being slaveowners. Completely dishonest argument and highly misleading.

 

No what’s ****ing insulting is that you REFUSE to acknowledge the wholesale FACT that blatant and gross levels of discrimination against races doesn’t just happen all at once. It starts with insidious bullshit like having POC only dorms and graduations. Attempts at dehumanizing the other race by asserting ALL whites are privileged and racist.

And the fact you don’t have the common decency to even ADMIT that it’s wrong means I don’t a give a damn what you find insulting.

 

Actually, your 2% number is using infants from states where slavery was illegal to artificially lower the numbers. Using households is much more accurate than indicting only the head of household as a slave owner when the slave ownership is intended to be passed down to family heirs.

 

No actually it’s not. It’s highly misleading. You’re asserting that you have a household of 8 people 2 90 year old grandparents who never owned a slave, a husband and wife and 4 children including one abolitionist daughter, one toddler and one infant. The ONLY actual slaveowner in the house is the husband and the owner. Yet your argument asserts that EVERYBODY in the house, the grandma, 2 month old Susie and even the abolitionist are all slaveowners.

You’re essentially arguing that if you have a thief in a household of 8 people, EVERY person in the house becomes a thief.

Not only is it logically defunct but it’s ONLY purpose is an attempt at inflating the numbers artificially.

I will say you’re right about one thing. I did include minors. So we can take that out. Decreasing the total population by approximately 25% (given that on average the total population consists of 25% under the age of 18 at any given time.

That still puts us at less than 9% slaveowners.

 

If the thief uses the riches they’ve stolen to purchase the houses of the family, and said family knows the houses are purchased with stolen goods, are they complicit in the act? Regardless, they have absolutely benefited.

It’s interesting that you would use the most convoluted of analysis to mitigate the extent which slave holding existed in a slave society. Yet, when looking at systemic racism, the statistics of higher incarceration rates, longer sentences for same crimes(including the variable of prior convictions,) and higher probability of death sentences eludes your understanding of such a problem.