Ok ... I apologize ... military personell serving in combat as embassy cocktail servers to private contractors are to be saluted as one of our boys ...
...actually he is dumb because he chose a weapon that has a bad reputation of jamming, which it did...he's a lib because a conservative would have chosen a better weapon... Kabuki Joe
...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...our boys?...you mean the guys that you and your kind spit on?...way too funny... Kabuki Joe
I'm from an all military family ... in fact I was born on a military base ... so how dare you .. LOL.
I asked him to let me know one way or the other. You have absolutely no idea what he did, which is beside the point, he served, I'll wager that you did not. So you have zero right to question his.
...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...you remind me of the kid that I work with, he lives off "google"...he was telling me all about how the reason the US went to the 556 round, lighter and you can carry more, but when I went through basic and ait the reason we were told was it's better to wound someone then to kill them...if you kill an enemy soldier you are only taking out one enemy, but if you wound an enemy soldier you are taking out 4 enemies; the wounded soldier, the 2 people carrying him and a 4th that is performing medical care...4 vs 1, what's better?...you are clueless... Kabuki Joe
You're right ... I'm the only one in my family for a hundred years who has never served ... I decided right about the time I was to commit ... I couldn't kill people ... However, I decided in 2008 that that liklihood became real when tea party zombies began to wage war on Dems/Libs as the Party of Hate & Death ... and starting learning about the best weaponary for defense against said zombies when they come to get me ... the only weapon I ever had ... my 'ol Ruger 10/22 wasn't gonna make it ...
...and I confirmed your point about the M-16 (AR-15 in civilian state) and added that only libs would choose a weapon designed for wounding instead of killing... Kabuki Joe
Yeah yeah ... everyone knows the M-16 had this specificity in it's design ... with a bullet that exited in *wobble and yaw*
The first part is honest, or sounds honest at least. The second part sounds like what people who spit on soldiers in San Francisco airports would say, or worse yet, it sounds like what code pink people who think that Cindy Sheehan is a genius would say.
...the 556 caliber vs the 762...762 does enough damage that even when it doesn't hit the body the trauma will kill someone, but you already know this from being in a military family...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...too much... Kabuki Joe
I don't know (*)(*)(*)(*) about military weapons for civilian use ... that's why I'm getting your goat ... that's how I get you to impress me sans BS ... and now I can go into one of Willards' Sports Authority's and know what I'm talking about and don't get ripped-off by one of Willards minimum wage idiots ... Thanks ... LOL.
That was then ... then is now ... if I have to start capp'n off tea party zombies coming to get me ... I want to be armed like in a zombie-massacre movie ... looks real enough ...
I won't get ripped-off ... I have you impressing me in braggodocio as to just what calibur I need to take out as many tea party zombies as I can before dropping the magazine for reload ...
You have zero perspective. If you lived a real life and served, you would never say a thing like that. Thats a feeling you never want to know. Never.
C'mon ... Bush did all he could to avoid even be considered to be shipped to Viet Nam ... I believe his final hideout was right here in North Alabama ... and look what he did ...
Look, are you gonna help me out with militray-grade weapons for use in urban and rural warfare and the logistical-use of ... for when the right-wing revolution goes down or just post nothing-one-liners ?
