Election Officials Nationwide Find No Voter Fraud --NYT

Much more reliable than Lying "Little Hitler" who is also showing us no evidence of any crime.

 

Wrong.

Absolutes are the province of the closed mind. I don't deal in absolutes.

No.

Again, absolutes.....etc.

 

Oh dear. You are aware that unless you gave a donation of $5,000, all the money you gave goes to his new Superpac, right?

 

you can strike 'election' from the line.

In essence, you've given $500 to a billionaire's legal fund who has thus far
lost 13 suits in a row.

Brilliant!

 

Totally.

The very definition of:

 

A republican senator has said that if Biden doesn't get security briefings by Friday, he's going to step in.

Trump's lawyers are getting laughed out of court. One of his lawyers, when asked by the judge how many republican watchers were in the room, the lawyer responded, "A non zero number of observers were in there." Judge - case dismissed.


I saw that the lack of access to security briefings in 2000 created a knowledge gap that may have contributed to 911.

Our enemies aren't sleeping. Let's get the president elect the information.

C'mon cry baby - put on your big boy pants and do what's best for America.

 

So one can live without FOX news and still be informed and open minded?

 

NYT is not a credible news source.

 

Nope. Just his Superpac. Only amounts over $5,000 are going to the legal fund.

 

Got one election official saying there is fraud? None I've seen .

 

Given that Trump's charity was closed for directing funds to his legal bills, which resulted in his charity being closed down for 'illegal activity', and he being fined $2,000,000, there is a high probability that a man of his character will do to you as he did to his donors to his charity.

Just sayin'.

 

No doubt. They may as well go burn the money in the backyard.

Who sends $500 to a billionaire to help fund his Superpac? Madness.

 

No journal is perfect, but it's rated very well, has won over 125 Pulitzers, is one of the four journals of record.
Rated "High" on the factual meter on MBFC.

So, no, as journals go, it's fairly reliable. I mean, compared to what? Gatewaypundit? Say it isn't so.

 

that’s all i can afford this week. i’m really hoping they take away my healthcare

 

It's your money. You do not it's not going to his defense fund, though, right?

 

Well, let’s wait for courts to decide.
This election is not usual in many ways. Hand recount in GA could help with calming down a large portion of the population.
I looked at results in WI and AZ, and in both states Biden leads by less than 21k votes in each state. Recount is definitely warranted and reevaluation of ballots really can make a difference. I remember reading WI governor saying that they once had a judge leading his opponent by about 7k votes, but after canvassing and audits the judge ended up losing the election. And that’s just a judge, how many votes, as a whole, were in question? I bet Trump and Biden got a heck of a lot more, making it possible that a tiny percentage of disqualified ballots flip the election. If this really happens, the progressive meltdown would be historic!

 

The courts are laughing at his lawyers. That's how it's going. 15 dismissed for lack of proof already.

 

Oh, a bunch of progressive journalists giving each other reviews about them being an honest and unbiased news source is supposed to be credible?
Sorry, but Braitbart has more credibility than NYT, at least because they are willing to cover things they don’t like.

 

What's wrong with you?? Trump is a billionaire, he can afford to fund the legal fund. He's got people like you suckered to paying the bill for him. No wonder he's a billionaire, he never spends his own money, instead getting other people to give him money.

 

I think Trump has a greater chance of winning this election due to statistical errors in ballot counting than the court ruling. The ballot count difference is so small, basic human error caused by people feeding ballots into the machines could make a difference, like those 7k votes Trump got back from one MI county due to incorrect ballot counting machine configuration.
Trump wins WI if he finds 1 county like that in this state, and if he finds 2-3 similar cases in AZ, and if he pulls GA - he wins.

That’s how effed up this election is. If I were a Dem I wouldn’t celebrate till the results are certified.

 

What a stupid tweet;

Trump; Nobody wants to report that Pennsylvania and Michigan didn’t allowed are Poll Watchers and/or Vote Observers to Watch and Observe. This is responsible for hundreds of thousands of votes that should not be allowed to count. Therefore, I easily win both states. Report the News!

________

He’s acting like a petulant little child who did not get his way on the playground.

 

Totally.

Everybody knows that all of these Trump BS Election "Cases" are going to get laughed out of Court.

Each and EVERY One.

 

The governor of Wisconsin said that the last time they did a recount, due to the margins being so small, they found a difference of 130 votes total.

It's over. It's been over.

He needs to give Biden access to transition activities so there is no knowledge gap.

What a child this man is.

 

NY Times, eh? This is the same paper that printed a story about Trump sexually harassing two women, and when those two women went on the air to say the story was a lie and that the reporter twisted their stories around, the Times stood by their lying reporters.

 

https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/a...onth=11&date=04&id=995375&oref=duckduckgo.com

See, Trump’s victory is a statistical possibility. That’s why I wouldn’t celebrate just yet.