I haven't been on this topic in ages, so I guess I will try and catch up. This is wrong. White coservatives have highest birthrates among whites. Its the white liberals who hold leftist views that have lowest. Hence it supports the idea of white genocide through propaganda such as overpopulation as being a problem in the world.
This is idiotic. No blacks or asians or whoever would say gee I don't care if my race disappears from Earth. There is an innate tribe and evolutionary reasoning for why we do want to keep our genetic and heritage in tact.
The white man's problem is that his whole political philosophy turned out to be his downfall. If he wants to continue to exist, he'll have to do away with said political philosophy and start anew. That's not going to happen.
I truly cannot understand how white racists continue to push and believe this. The most successful society in the world by a pretty large margin, America, is also the most multicultural, and predominately white. The true stupidity involved in racism is absolutely overwhelming.
Really? None? What constitutes a tribe? How would an organism benefit by preserving its "genetic heritage" (whatever that means)?
Blue eyes are a genetically recessive trait which is increasingly rare in America and white Americans as a whole may be losing this genetic heritage passed down from ancient European hunter-gatherers. There is no genetic advantage in possessing blue eyes, which is largely cosmetic, but most American models are blue-eyed.
These are valid points re the arguments made for 'reparations' and the like. I think it would be funny if Sharpton and the other black racists were found to be descendants of the free black slave traders in Charleston who were at one time the largets slave dealers in the South. That would be just too hilarious, seeing some clown like Al having to cough up his share of 'reparations'. But, outside of that argument, it's all water under the bridge at this point, and the focus should be on doing away with quotas and social promotions and all the other racist discrimination, and let a real meritocracy rise, regardless of who or what color those who apply themselves to the efforts are. Statistically there are black people who can and do compete favorably; they arent' all stupid, and many are in fact social conservatives if not economic conservatives, and there are geniuses in their gene pool, and those should be able to be all they can be. It's more about culture anyway, and WASP culture is obviously the best so far in the cultural evolution wars.
It's almost axiomatic that any trait that persist has some genetic advantage under the conditions from which it arose. Blue eyes in humans seems to have originated in Northern Europe. Also the only dog breed I'm familiar with blue eyes is the Malamute Husky, which is a northern breed. Additionally I believe the blue eyed lemurs of Madagasscar live in the cooler mountains. It would seem likely blue eyes are associated with an adaptation to cold climates. My guess is we inherited the trait from Neanderthals, who survived in Europe through several ice ages.
I truly cannot understand how you anti-white's still continue to use the word racist for an argument.
My guess would be that it's a "spandrel" or non adaptive trait caused by pleiotropic secondary effect of a gene selected for adaptation of another trait, which is loss of skin pigment. It may also be sexually selected. Novelty appears to be sexually selected.
I brought my copy of "Culture". Spandrel is quoted there some where. Thanks for explaining to me what spandrel means. I was confused. Here is the original source. Gould and Lewontin, "The Spandrels of San Marco" At any rate the anti-whites see blonds (implying blue eyes) as a marker for whites. There was a prediction about 15 years back that the last blond would be born in Finland in about 2200. Anti-whites were secretly gloating about the coming success of their genocide. "Asia for Asians, Africa for Africans, white countries for everyone."
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/18/us/18census.html?_r=0 - - - Updated - - - Sure some would but the majority? NOPE
Ugh, exactly... The best people I know have zero or one kid. It's not even a matter of race, but class. Yes, I'm classist. Why? Maybe poor people who can't even afford one kid shouldn't be permitted to have 6. Maybe becoming a parent, given that it requires you to be responsible for an innocent 3rd party, should be a privilege rather than a right. It's like oh hey my life is depressing and meaningless better have another kid and make everybody else pay for it in more ways than one. And yes, I have known poor people, white people for that matter, with that attitude in my home town.
An Asian family had an inflation-adjusted median wealth of $91,440 in 2013, up almost 43 percent from 1989, that compares with a 3 percent increase to $134,008 for whites. Non-Hispanic whites are having fewer children relative to other groups and their fertility rate (1.76) is very close to that of Asians (1.77). Preliminary 2012 data show that non-Hispanic whites have a total fertility rate of 1.76 children per woman, compared to 1.90 for non-Hispanic blacks, 2.19 for Hispanics, and 1.77 for Asians. It can be said that middle-class families are prone to have fewer children than their working-class counterparts.
After the white people are gone it will be necessary for nonwhites to have leadership. That's where Asians come in. They will direct the activities of the other nonwhites.
Jews are generally not White. Even if they were, since they are an endogamous group they are insulated from the immigration invasion and race mixing propaganda they push in an effort to suppress their WASP competitors. Also "muh holocaust" excuses them from their White guilt propaganda.
Even when the US and Europe suddenly disappear from the face of the earth in a catastrophic event, East Asian countries are capable of running the world as China is becoming the driving force of the world economy. China recently founded the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), which could eventually replace other financial institutions founded by the US such as the IMF and the World Bank.
No, It Ain’t Gonna Be Like That Satoshi Kanazawa, Interdisciplinary Institute of Management, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, United Kingdom. Email: s.kanazawa@lse.ac.uk. Abstract: For cultural, social, and institutional reasons, Asians cannot make original contributions to basic science. I therefore doubt Miller's prediction for the Asian future of evolutionary psychology. I believe that its future will continue to be in the United States and Europe.
