MOD ALERT Palestinians - Their hatred is the cause of their misery.

This reflects the archaic belief that national soveriegnty is based upon the government as opposed the be believe that national sovereignty is established by the people. The "People" are the "Nation" and not the government.

In Article 22 of the League of Nations Covenant it expressly established that the "Mandatory" of territories that were no longer under "colonial" subjugation of foreign powers (including the former Turkish Empire) were to provide "tutelage" for the residents of these formerly occupied territories so that they could form modern governments.

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/leagcov.asp#art22

It was the residents in the territories that had been previously under the control of the Turkish Empire that were to be taught the lessons upon which modern governments were founded and this did not provide any authority to the "Mandatory" to give that land away to foreign immigrants from Europe to create a new nation as that would violate the Rights of the People. As we know Great Britian decided to divide the territory it became the "Mandatory" into two independent political entities (i.e. Palestine and Transjordan) and it had the obligation to develop each so that the existing residents could establish their own modern governments under Article 22..


The "Zionist" immigration to Palestine directly violated the conditions of Article 22 as Palestine never belonged to European Jews, or for that matter to Great Britian. Palestine belonged to the Palestinians that were living in Palestine at the end of WW I and to no one else.

 

Bollocks ...... Thievery Palestinian land purloined by your Talmud nazi friends is just plane stealing regardless of your bigotry.

Highlander

 

So let us tackle what you have written nonchalantly above (i.e. Your Belief)...
You are or must be under the impression that people (encroachers on someone else' land being absent or living there) can in all dishonesty be called a homogenous people of a stolen country historically belonging to the Jewish people??? Sadly it is not so... For the legal title of the Jewish people to the Mandated territory of Palestine in all of its historical parts and dimensions was first acknowledged and recognized under modern international law on April 24, 1920. That is when the 'Supreme Council' of the Principal Allied Powers, consisting of Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan, after a heated debate between the highest British and French representatives, decided to approve the 'Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, and thereby give international legal effect to its provisions. This decision was taken at a session of the San Remo Peace Conference, convoked to complete the work of the earlier Conference of London in February 1920 to prepare a treaty of Peace with chattered Ottoman Empire and make an authoritative settlement for the ex-Turkish territories in Asia. By virtue of this decision, known as the San Remo Resolution on Palestine, the Balfour Declaration was to constitute and because the legal basis for administering Palestine, in conjunction with the general provision of the newly-established Mandate System.

The minutes of the San Remo Peace Conference drawn up at the session held on April 25, 1920 make it clear that this is what Lloyd George actually meant when he defined Palestine according to the Biblical formula from ‘Dan to Beersheba’, as appears from his documented reliance on George Adam Smith’s scholarly works to determine the exact territorial extent of ancient Israelite habitation and rule. He included in Palestine all the land historically settled or occupied by Jews in the first and second Temple Periods. This confirmed by the third recital in the Preamble of the Mandate, which refers to the Historical connection of the Jewish People with Palestine and is further evidenced by Colonel Richard Meinertzhagen who recalled in his book, the statement made by Lloyd George in Paris in 1919 regarding the true meaning of “Palestine”; The area occupied by the Twelve Tribes of Israel, from Dan to Beersheba, Middle East Diary… Thomas Yoseloff, Publisher New York, p. 365.
Enough said to be continued.

 

In addition the following :

How to Lie about Israel -- and Get Away With It!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=a6_zH4NV2xY

 

I will let the Rabbi answer your vehement dislike of Jews... this is dedicated to you and Jonsa

Video Of Interest: Rabbi Lord Jonathan Sacks Speech At AIPAC 2013
Chief rabbi of England Lord Jonathan Sacks in New York. Must Watch this video right to the end. One man's words for a lifetime.

It’s such a masterpiece.
Not many things around you today make you feel proud to be a Jew like this speech will

http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/article.php?p=161319

 

Perhaps, and in view of the above, you might care to explain why the UN, America, the European Union and pretty much the rest of the world is united in condemning the criminal activities of your government in allowing and encouraging settlement expansion, and continued erosion of Palestinian land. Are they all Jew-haters, or do you think they might actually have a genuine issue?

 

Palestine did not belong to Great Britain, France, Italy or Japan. It belonged to the "Palestinians" (i.e. Arabs, Jews, Christains and others) that were the residents and citizens of Palestine. Only the "Palestinians" had the Right of Self-Determination and any decisions that were made that did not include the approval of the People of Palestine were invalid.

 

Apparently you do not read well history or perhaps have some inner resistance understanding it if you do.
You are another one of these <Do not bother me with Historical Truths for my mind is already made up>.

Do everyone a favor and go peddle <your hate against the Jews to Poland> where you are quite familiar with.
You carry on with what your elder are guilty of <the elimination of 3 x Million Polish Jews>.

 

This was the <Ottoman Empire> for 400 years... 1517 - 1917
They called it Palestine because it was geographically Southern Syria and Syria Lebanon were a <FRENCH MANDATE>

There was no <Palestinian identity> it was the Ottoman Empire... Palestine of the Mandate was also called <Eretz Israel = The Land of the Jews>...

The decision makers at the San Remo Conference, the Balfour Declaration and the receivers of the Mandate <the British>... During that time, The Allies (Great Britain, France, Italy and Japan) were the decision makers and no one could oppose them especially after the British victory in 1917 conquest of Jerusalem and Damascus. Please put your emotions aside, put your obstructionist feelings aside and go to the library... In theory your above notion would have applied to countries in existence but not to Israel in its formative years.

 

Oil interests... 57 Muslim countries and 22 Arab countries... makes Israel defeat in the UN <PERMANENT!>

 

Here something that will help your credo...


PSR poll 48 - June 2013
17 June 2013
PRESS RELEASE

Palestinian Public Opinion Poll No (4

While a majority supports the appointment of Rami Al Hamdallah as Prime
Minister, 40% believe the Palestinian Authority has become a burden on the
Palestinian people and only 30% believe that it is an accomplishment. And
while Ismail Haniyeh wins against Abbas in presidential elections in the
Gaza Strip, half of the public believes that the Palestinian have a failed
leadership

13-15 June 2013

These are the results of the latest poll conducted by the Palestinian Center
for Policy and Survey Research (PSR) in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip
between 13-15 June 2013. The period before the poll witnessed the
resignation of the government of Salam Fayyad and the appointment of a new
government headed by Rami Al Hamdallah, President of Al Najah University.
The period also witnessed the re-election of Khalid Mishaal as head of
Hamas&#146;s political bureau for a new term and the postponement of the
formation of a reconciliation government. This press release covers public
evaluation of the general West Bank and Gaza conditions, elections,
reconciliation, public evaluation of the performance of the government of
Ismail Haniyeh, public satisfaction with the performance of President Mahmud
Abbas, the internal balance of power between Fateh and Hamas, and the views
of the public on the most vital Palestinian goals and the main problems
Palestinians confront today. Total size of the sample is 1270 adults
interviewed face to face in 127 randomly selected locations. Margin of error
is 3%.

For further details, contact PSR director, Dr. Khalil Shikaki, or Walid
Ladadweh at tel 02-296 4933 or email pcpsr@pcpsr.org.


Main Findings:

Findings of the second quarter of 2013 show that a majority of the public
supports the appointment of Rami Al Hamdallah as prime minister and that two
thirds support the resignation of Salam Fayyad. Despite this, half of the
public agrees with the view attributed to Fayyad that the Palestinian
leadership has been a failed one from the beginnings. Indeed, less than a
third of the public believes that the Palestinian Authority (PA), with its
two parts in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, is an accomplishment for the
Palestinian people while 40% believe that the PA is a burden on the
Palestinian people. There is no doubt that the deteriorating economic
conditions in the West Bank, the pessimism about the chances for
reconciliation, and the continued deadlock in the political process
negatively affect public assessment of the PA and the Palestinian
leadership. Findings also indicate a rise in Hamas&#146; popularity and that of
Ismail Haniyeh in the Gaza Strip only with support for Hamas and Fatah very
close and with Haniyeh winning over Abbas by five percentage points. In the
West Bank, however, Fatah remains more popular than Hamas, with 17
percentage point difference and Abbas against Haniyeh with 13 percentage
point difference.

Findings also indicate that optimism about reconciliation between Fatah and
Hamas is in decline and that the belief that the current split is permanent
or will stay for a long time is on the rise. A majority believes that the
chances for reconciliation are non-existent as long as freedom is denied to
supporters of Fatah and Hamas in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank
respectively, as long as no date is set for national elections, as long as
security coordination with Israel continues, and as long as Hamas refuses to
accept agreements signed between the PLO and Israel. .

Finally, findings show that a clear majority supports the Abbas-Abdullah
Holy Places Agreement, signed on 31 March 2013, which recognizes Kind
Abdullah&#146;s custodianship over al Haram al Sharif in East Jerusalem. But only
a slightly less than a third supports an immediate confederation with Jordan
while one quarter support such confederation later after the ending of
occupation. The largest percentage opposes a confederation with Jordan, now
or in the future.

(1) Presidential and Legislative Elections:

If new presidential elections are held today and only two were nominated,
Abbas would receive the vote of 49% and Haniyeh 44% of the vote of those
participating. The rate of participation in such elections would reach 64%.
Three months ago, Abbas received the support of 52% and Haniyeh 41%. In this
poll, in the Gaza Strip, Abbas receives 46% and Haniyeh 51% and in the West
Bank Abbas receives 51% and Haniyeh 38%.

If presidential elections were between Marwan Barghouti and Ismail Haniyeh,
the former would receive 57% and the latter would receive 36% of the
participants&#146; votes. The rate of participation in this case would reach 72%.
In our March poll Barghouti received 60% of the vote and Haniyeh 33%.

If presidential elections were between three: Mahmud Abbas, Marwan Barghouti
and Ismail Haniyeh, Barghouti would receive the largest percentage (35%)
followed by Haniyeh (33%), and Abbas (27%). The rate of participation in
this case would reach 76%. In our previous poll last March, Barghouti
received 38%, Haniyeh 31%, and Abbas 26%.

If new legislative elections are held today with the participation of all
factions, 72% say they would participate in such elections. Of those who
would participate, 30% say they would vote for Hamas and 41% say they would
vote for Fatah, 9% would vote for all other third parties combined, and 21%
are undecided. Vote for Hamas in the Gaza Strip stands in this poll at 38%
and in the West Bank at 24%. Vote for Fatah in the Gaza Strip stands in this
poll at 41% and in the West Bank at 41%. These results are similar to those
obtained three months ago with the exception of the vote for Hamas in the
Gaza Strip which stood at 33% at that time.


(2) Domestic Conditions:

Positive evaluation of conditions in the Gaza Strip rises from 32% three
months ago to 36% in this poll while 38% say conditions are bad or very bad.

Positive evaluation of conditions in the West Bank rises slightly from 29%
three months ago to 31% in this poll while 37% say conditions are bad or
very bad.

Perception of corruption in PA institutions in the West Bank stands at 77%
in this poll. Perception of corruption in the public institutions of Hamas&#146;
Gaza government stands at 61%.
22% say there is, and 45% say there is to some extent, press freedom in the
West Bank. By contrast, 19% say there is, and 34% say there is to some
extent, press freedom in the Gaza Strip.

32% of the Palestinian public say people in the West Bank can criticize the
authority in the West Bank without fear. By contrast, 23% of the public say
people in the Gaza Strip can criticize the authorities in Gaza without fear.

Perception of safety and security in the West Bank stands at 56% and in the
Gaza Strip at 64%. Three months ago these percentages stood at 67% in the
Gaza Strip and 54% in the West Bank.

Findings show that the percentage of Gazans who say they seek immigration to
other countries stands at 42%; in the West Bank, the percentage stands at
27%. Last March these percentages stood at 49% and 27% respectively.

Positive evaluation of the performance of the Haniyeh government stands at
41%.

Percentage of satisfaction with the performance of President Abbas remains
unchanged at 49%. Dissatisfaction with the president performance stands
today at 48%.

Two thirds support and 24% oppose the resignation of Salam Fayyad as prime
minister.

By contrast, 59% support the appointment of Rami Al Hamdallah as prime
minister; 21% oppose the appointment and 20% expressed no opinion.

49% agree with a statement attributed to Salam Fayyad that the Palestinian
leadership from the beginning has been a failed one and 47% disagree with
the statement.


(3) Reconciliation:

Given the ups and downs in the Fateh-Hamas reconciliation dialogue,
percentage of optimism about the chances for reunification of the West Bank
and the Gaza Strip stands at 17%. The belief that unity is impossible and
that two separate entities will emerge increases from 33% three months ago
to 36% in this poll. 44% believe that unity will be restored but only after
a long time.

34% say that ending the split requires regime change in both the West Bank
and the Gaza Strip while 13% say it requires regime change in the Gaza Strip
only and an identical percentage believes that it requires regime change in
the West Bank. Only 34% say that restoring unity does not require regime
change in the West Bank or the Gaza Strip.

We asked respondents about conditions under which they believe
reconciliation cannot succeed. Three quarters believe that reconciliation
will not succeed without first ending the restrictions on freedoms enjoyed
by supporters of Hamas in the West Bank and a similar percentage (74%)
believes that it will not succeed without ending restrictions on freedoms
enjoyed by supporters of Fatah in the Gaza Strip.

Similarly, 66% say it will not succeed without first agreeing on an election
date; 59% say it will not succeed if Hamas continues to reject agreements
signed by the PLO with Israel; 61% say it will not succeed if security
coordination with Israel in the West Bank continues; another 60% say it will
not succeed if the PA continues to recognize Israel and the Oslo agreements;
and 50% say it will not succeed as along as Hamas insists on keeping its al
Qassam armed wing in the Gaza Strip.

The largest percentage (40%) believes that the PA, with its parts in the
West Bank and the Gaza Strip, has become a burden on the Palestinian people
and 30% believe that it is an accomplishment for the Palestinian people.
Furthermore, 12% believe that the PA in the West Bank is an accomplishment
while the PA in the Gaza Strip is a burden. By contrast, an identical
percentage (12%) believes that the PA in the Gaza Strip is an accomplishment
while the PA in the West Bank is a burden.

28% say that the election of Khalid Mishaal as head of Hamas for a new term
will speed up the process of reconciliation while 22% say it will slow it
down. 42% say it will have no impact on reconciliation.


(4) Most vital Palestinian goals and the main problems confronting
Palestinians today:

42% believe that the first most vital Palestinian goal should be to end
Israeli occupation in the areas occupied in 1967 and build a Palestinian
state in the West Bank and the Gaza Strip with East Jerusalem as its
capital. By contrast, 34% believe the first most vital goal should be to
obtain the right of return of refugees to their 1948 towns and villages, 14%
believe that it should be to build a pious or moral individual and a
religious society, one that applies all Islamic teachings, and 10% believe
that the first and most vital goal should be to establish a democratic
political system that respects freedoms and rights of Palestinians. Three
months ago, 46% said ending occupation and building a state was most vital
goal and 31% said the most vital goal was the right of return.

The most serious problem confronting Palestinian society today is the spread
of poverty and unemployment in the eyes of 29% of the public while 23% say
it is the absence of national unity due to the West Bank-Gaza Strip split,
22% believe the most serious problem is the continuation of occupation and
settlement activities, 18% believe the most serious problem is corruption in
some public institutions, and 7% believe it is the siege and the closure of
the Gaza border crossings.

(5) Holy Places Agreement and relations with Jordan:

58% support and 41% oppose the Holy Places agreement signed between Kind
Abdullah of Jordan the Mahmud Abbas in which the Palestinian side
acknowledges the King&#146;s custodianship over al Haram al Sharif (Noble
Sanctuary) in Jerusalem.

But 40% say they oppose a confederation with Jordan now and in the future
while 31% say they support a confederation with Jordan now and 24% say they
support a confederation with Jordan but only after the ending of Israeli
occupation.
---------------------------------

This PSR Poll has been conducted with the support of the Konrad Adenauer
Stiftung in Ramallah.

--------------------------------------------
IMRA - Independent Media Review and Analysis
Website: www.imra.org.il

 

While subjected to the rule of the Ottoman Empire "Palestine" (i.e. the territory of Palestine established by the British when it divided the territory of its "Mandatory" into "Palestine and Transjordon" at the end of WW I) still belonged to the People living in Palestine.

The only entity that has Rights is the Person and national soveriegnty is based upon the individual sovereignty of the People living within territorial boundries. The fact that they might be subjected to the tyrannical rule of other "people" from other nations merely represents a violation of the Rights of the Person and nothing more.

The "People of Palestine" had the "Right of Self-Deterimination" that was violated by the British and the European Zionist immigrants. The "People of Palestine" rejected the partition of Palestine for example and that made the partition of Palestine by the Zionist Jews a violation of the Right of Self-Deterimination of ALL Palestinians. Partition would have required both the Arabs and the Jews to agree to it and that never happened.

The creation of Israel violated the Right of Self-Determination of the People living in Palestine.

 

NO it was <Ottoman Empire> period...

Repeating yourself... nothing new under the sun.

- - - Updated - - -

[h=2]Bennett: ‘The Idea of Establishing a Palestinian State Reached a Dead End’[/h]The only real solution is "to build, to build, to build" in Judea and Samaria.
By: Yori Yanover
Published: June 17th, 2013







print

tell a friend



Minister Naftali Bennett wants to impose Israeli rule on the C area.


Jewish Home Minister Naftali Bennett stated that the very idea of a Palestinian state in Eretz Israel has reached a dead end.
“Our biggest problem is the unwillingness of Israeli leaders to state clearly that Eretz Israel belongs to the nation of Israel,” Bennett said at a conference inJerusalem of the Yesha Council (Yesha is an acronym for Judea and Samaria).
He added that the only real solution is “to build, to build, to build” in Judea and Samaria. In his opinion, the Palestinian problem does not require a solution, it requires getting used to living with it.
Bennett gave an example of a friend of his from the Army, who took a shrapnel in his lower body, and continued to suffer intermittent pain attacks as a result. The doctors told him they could remove the shrapnel, but there was a 50 percent chance that he would become paralyzed as a result.
Bennett challenged his audience, to see how many of them would have opted for the surgery and a chance of paralysis, compared to learning to live with the pain. The answer was obvious: the Palestinian shrapnel will continue to cause Israel pain, but a final solution could cripple the Jewish state for good.
Bennett advocated imposing Israeli rule in the C area of the disputed territories, and there to invest a great deal in improving the lives of both Israelis and Palestinians.
Likud MK Ze’ev Elkin who spoke at the same conference said this was strictly Bennett’s view and it did not represent the opinion of Prime Minister Netanyahu or the government.
Elkin said that despite his own general approval for Bennett’s view, he also recognizes that the coalition government includes partners like Tzipi Rivlin, whose views on the same issue are diametrically opposed to Bennett’s.

 

The one thing that is absolutely certain is that the nazi colonists had no right whatever to a single inch of Palestine,

 

Abu Adolf Mazen and his followers should build their "palestine" in Jordan.
Nazi terror Hammas in Gaza should unite with Egypt and Morsiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

 

Qu

How do you substantiate <Nazi colonists> ? Perhaps Jews returning to their ancestral Land to build it...
<Judea and Samaria> are two Jewish names and the Bible attests to that!

 

Of course you have the right to your bigotry but even the UN have called you nazi butchers for the crimes against humanity.
But I bet you thank you god for the America veto!
How is bezellibub ....... your god?
Well your actions of your creed is an aberration of normality that's seldom seen. If ever!
Regards
Highlander

 

Lol, Muslims and Jews have the same god.
Call it Allllaa , call it bezellibub or whatever ... it doesn't matter.
WHAT MATTERS IS THAT GOD HAS SOMETHING NOT GOOD AGAINST ARABS !!
MORE THEN 100000 FROM HIS MUSLIM FOLLOWERS HAD BRUTALEY MURDERED SINCE JANUARY 1ST...........
THINK ABOUT IT !!

 

Mmmm ........ And those murdered with have the hands of your Talmud Zionist written all over the graves!

But you miss the point entirely.

As we they goy have no rights, your conscious is clear and your lot have no shame regardless how low you stoop!

Highlander

 

The blooded hands of those who everyday murder and butcher Arabs and Muslims are Arabs and Muslims !!
Talmud Babalud ... BS.
The Islamits are SOOOOOOO FRUSTRATED due to their (*)(*)(*)(*)ty situation !!

<<< MODERATOR EDIT: BYPASS PROFANITY FILTER >>>

 

What is ISLAM by a MUSLIM WOMAM Nonie Darwish

"Joys of Muslim Women" By Nonie Darwish

Subject: "Joys of Muslim Women" By Nonie Darwish

THIS IS IMPORTANT FOR ALL OF US TO READ!!!!!!!!!!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

FOR THIS TO COME TO PASS ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS NOTHING

This was written by a woman born in Egypt as a Muslim. Make sure you read the paragraph (in red) towards the end.

Joys of Muslim Women
~By Nonie Darwish


In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.

The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.


Even though a woman is abused she cannot obtain a divorce.

To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses.

Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.


The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.


The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.
In the Western World ( Canada, Australia, United States and Britain ) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife cannot obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American, Canadian, Universities and British Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.


By passing this on, enlightened Canadian, Australians, American and British women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.

Ripping the West in Two.

Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.


She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law. Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old. Her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel . He was a high-ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza ..


When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position in Muslim society, but Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing.. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.


In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping shariah law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.


For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed. Westerners generally assume all religions encourage a respect for the dignity of each individual. Islamic law (Sharia) teaches that non-Muslims should be subjugated or killed in this world.


Peace and prosperity for one's children is not as important as assuring that Islamic law rules everywhere in the Middle East and eventually in the world.


While Westerners tend to think that all religions encourage some form of the golden rule, Shariah teaches two systems of ethics - one for Muslims and another for non-Muslims. Building on tribal practices of the seventh century, Shariah encourages the side of humanity that wants to take from and subjugate others.


While Westerners tend to think in terms of religious people developing a personal understanding of and relationship with God, Shariah advocates executing people who ask difficult questions that could be interpreted as criticism


It's hard to imagine, that in this day and age, Islamic scholars agree that those who criticize Islam or choose to stop being Muslim should be executed. Sadly, while talk of an Islamic reformation is common and even assumed by many in the West, such murmurings in the Middle East are silenced through intimidation.


While Westerners are accustomed to an increase in religious tolerance over time, Darwish explains how petro dollars are being used to grow an extremely intolerant form of political Islam in her native Egypt and elsewhere.


(In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in Canada, Australia, the U.S. And Britain To elect the heads of Government by themselves! Rest assured they will do so... You can look at how they have taken over several towns in the USA &#8230; Dearborn Michigan is one and there are others...) (Britain has several cities now totally controlled by Muslims)


I think everyone in Canada, Australia, the U.S. And Great Britain Should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!


It is too bad that so many are disillusioned with life and Christianity to accept Muslims as peaceful.. Some may be but they have an army that is willing to shed blood in the name of Islam.. The peaceful support the warriors with their finances and own kind of patriotism to their religion. While Canada, Australia, the U.S.A. and Britain are getting rid of Christianity from all public sites and erasing God from the lives of children the Muslims are planning a great jihad on North America, Australia and Britain .....


This is your chance to make a difference...! Pass it on to your email list or at least those you think will listen.
Some of those I'm sending it to WILL NOT! Put your head back under the covers AND DO NOTHING!

 

Whereas the Zionists are in a state of dementia because their paymasters won't let 'em set up gas-ovens for Semites, as their Great Model directed. As we all know, the imperialists have been murdering Muslims in their millions for very many years. How do the weirdoes get so muddled? Drugs, I suppose.

 

Ooh. I agree the Arab family must be frustrated. When the AIPAC owned senators hand picked each and almost everyone, steal money from the American tax payer to commit genocide again daily mostly against unarmed women and children, aye the have the right to be frustrated
Your heroes of the idf. Beaten twice by young boys of Hezbollah so your degenerates fired the guns and bombed against women and children in Lebanon. Frightened of young boys, fighting for the protection of there families against American sponsored genocide.

Regards
Highlander

 

Continued from above :

Gaza Strip-Hamas Terrorist Tactics in the Gaza Strip! VIDEO


http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=P8W6CoCyFCU#!

 

the imperialists have been murdering Muslims in their millions ?
We cannot seriously relate to empty sentences.
imperialists ? Murdering Muslims ? In their millions ???
What are you talking about ???????? the 21st century or the 5th century ?...
The blooded hands of those who everyday murder and butcher Arabs and Muslims are Arabs and Muslims !!