Mueller may be winding down his investigation

There is enough evidence already to convict the Admin, Republican party and the NRA of conspiracy. Fox News as well. When you have a glut of stuff to go thru, at some point you have to declare, enough.

 

Psst---Cohen's not being investigated by the special counsel. You're welcome for the newsflash.

 

You haven't seen any of the evidence.

Elaborate on your claim, because it seems like a conclusion in search of logic and reason.

 

If there was even the slightest proof of collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, it would have been released by now. Either through official channels or through intentional leaks. And I know there is no evidence because I know the Russian collusion narrative was invented by the Clinton campaign after they found out that their dirty laundry would be exposed to the entire world. Guccifer 2.0 was obviously invented by the Clinton campaign - whoever was behind the Guccifer 2.0 persona, it wasn't a Russian intelligence operative, that much is obvious. This is all a transparent fabrication meant to discredit Trump's presidency and inflame tensions with Russia.

As for the unrelated charges of money laundering and such, those do not warrant a special counsel with millions spent on it and wall-to-wall media coverage. In the cesspit that is Washington DC, those charges are frankly pedestrian.

 

It actually does. The idea that Mueller is sitting on collusion evidence and instead of using it he is wasting months trying to get Trump to agree to an interview and set up perjury trap defies common sense.

 

You're psychic now? Send me a private message about who to bet on for the next Super Bowl.

Mueller's squad interviews people already knowing what they've done; you haven't noticed that pattern yet? If not, you're not payng much attention.

BTW, still puzzled as to the claim that you "know" there's nothing when you have absolutely no idea what evidence has been collected.

 

That's probably pretty close to the truth... there are probably too many avenues of probable crimes for 1 special prosecutor to handle... Mueller is going to have to pick and choose what crimes he think are most important (and have the most teeth)... most criminal campaign in history!!

 

That's what I said, after 2 years of spying and eavesdropping on Trump's campaign, after 1.5 years of investigation, conducted by 20 hostile "star" prosecutors, after millions of documents and thousands of interrogations, after all this the absence of even a shred of collusion evidence tells anyone with a brain and common sense everything one needs to know about it.

 

If you know the Russian collusion narrative was invented by liars who hate Trump, and if you haven't seen a shred of evidence backing up that narrative, then it's entirely reasonable to assume that no such evidence exists, and that the narrative was a fabrication meant to discredit Trump and inflame tensions with Russia. It simply requires one to put two and two together.

 

https://www.vox.com/2018/6/11/17438386/trump-russia-collusion

 

Who are these horrible "liars"?

 

Oh absolutely! At that moment Putin positively fell in love with Hillary and Obama:

 

Yea, and maybe someone has evidence that Obama's wife is really a tranny. We won't know until they divulge it though, so let's not make any assumptions either way until the facts are known.

 

So, you believe that Mueller is obligated to leak his evidence to the media and public? Because that's another very puzzling claim---no criminal investigation is public until it is completed, Commissioner Gordon.

Do you think that a drunk driver 'didn't do it" because the police and prosecutor haven't personally knocked on your door to give you a briefing and courtesy copy of the evidence, too? Because that's not only dangerously naive, it show that your posts just lack a common sense perspective.

 

OMG, so naive!!! So much ignorance!!!

He will announce his results when the investigation is over. What evidence he has or doesn't have is not known. This isn't the trump White House. His team doesn't leak.

His "phony investigation" has resulted in what, 20 indictments so far?!?! Most lawyers would give their eye-teeth for such phony results.

But his job is not to prosecute trump whether he is guilty or not. His job is to hand over the results of his investigation to the DOJ and Congress.

 

Interesting. I'm going to remind you of this.

 

*LOL*

 

Wow... really?

Let's start with the biggest liar of them all: Hillary Clinton.

And then we can make our way through the litany of intelligence officials whose entire job is to lie to people about what they do in secret.

James Clapper, for example, lied under oath about the existence of the NSA's mass spying program, yet he is the man whose hand-picked analysts concluded, based on zero proof, that Russia supposedly interfered in US elections.

 

I was being sarcastic. I was using the same silly logic that you are using except I applied it towards someone you probably admire.

 

I hear you, Mueller is sitting on collusion evidence and instead of using it he lets the traitor stay in the Oval office and is wasting months trying to interview Trump and entrap him on perjury. Makes perfect sense among people whose brain has been destroyed by TDS.

 

Twenty indictments that have nothing to do with collusion between the Trump campaign and the Russian government, which was the entire point of this phony investigation. Citing those indictments as proof of success is like someone going on an expedition to find the lost city of Atlantis and discovering some Mayan pottery shards instead.

 

And here I thought that reality had reared its ugly head in one of your posts.

I apologize for giving you the benefit of the doubt.

So, share with the forum when Mueller admitted to you that he has no evidence. Was it "official", or were you 2 just downing some shots and Mueller pulled a "Papadapoulos" and spilled the beans?

 

If he "hands off" these cases he better hand them to his cuckbuddies in the NY Attorney's office, let them waste their time and their money.

 

There's a reason why it's called a PRESUMPTION of innocence.

 

The state is presumed to have no evidence until it demonstrates otherwise. That's how a liberal society is supposed to work.