It looks like a quote from the mello guy... I thought romney was a super richy rich guy, and daddy gave him millions.... You mean the Romneys pulled themselves up from their bootstraps ? This wont go well for Obama and his minions of liars...
The problem for our poor isn't being skinny. It is being too fat. I think they should have access to the workforce, not free money.
Then, accusing Capitalism of being less than perfect seems silly, since by your own admission, it could not be perfect. You are missing the point. There is no Utopia. There is no perfect blend of capitalism and socialism. The UK is proof of that. Things are a mess over there. They have crappy health care rationing and chronic high unemployment. Who would want that? Yet, that's exactly what the progressives want for us. The best anti-poverty system ever invented is the family. As we have moved away from a family-orientated society, chronic poverty has only gotten worse. We need families and jobs for Americans. No more of this immigrants doing the jobs that Americans don't want to do. That crap has to stop. And,we need to address the trade deficit with Asia.
I'd suggest you use a straw when drinking your O Kool Aid, that way you won't spill. http://americanactionforum.org/topic/president-obama’s-488-billion-regulatory-burden
Maybe we should just create an auto-link to 2008 threads that previously posted this stuff and save us all a lot of time.
Okay, Mr. Ad Hominem aka "I can't make an argument so I am going to suggest you are in a cult". Why exactly do you think anybody should debate with you if you can't refrain from the name calling for two whole posts? Also, none of those regulations have anything to do with small businesses. Seriously, if you can't point to one regulation put on small businesses, just admit it.
Taxation of any form is "redistribution of wealth". So I too, believe in redistribution. I think you'll find even most conservatives support some amount of redistribution.
There is no perfect blend of capitalism and socialism, therefore we should simply create a system without any blend of the two? By the way, I don't think you have any clue what you are talking about when you bring up the UK's unemployment since it has historically been lower than ours for about ten years running now. Also, pointing out how one country isn't doing as great isn't an "end-all" to the discussion. LOOK AT SOMALIA, THEY HAVE NO REGULATIONS AND THEY ARE DOING BAD, THEREFORE CAPITALISM=BAD. Same (*)(*)(*)(*) idea, same stupidity.
The Republicans have been fighting mightly to redistribute wealth to the 1%ers, and since 1981, have been tremendously successful.
Not much to mince, he wants to redistribute. We all know what that means, hell my baby daughter knows.
Yup, it means to take money from one group and give it to another. Like Obama did with GM and like every President for the last century has done with farm subsidies and like Bush did with TARP and like... never mind, you see where I'm going.
Good response, but it still lacks the specifics about what programs he has instituted which increase redistribution.
Since you failed to read any of my last post, below is just some of the burden Obama has thrown on business, and yet most won't be felt until later on. You can't make an argument, because you have no argument, the article explains what Obama has done, and is going to do to small business. Perhaps if I embolden and enlarge the print it may help you. Oops, that must be the cultist in me. LOL! AAF began tracking every proposed and final rule in 2011. That year alone the Administration published more than $231 billion in regulatory costs. AAF reviewed 6,705 regulations in 2011 and has tracked more than 4,700 regulations to date in 2012.
Which makes everybody who doesn't have insurance pay a fee, that isn't redistribution. Which he didn't do. Increasing the amount of people that are to be rolled off welfare to employment by 20% doesn't "redistribute" Mmm, and there I will agree with you, not a great move.
Gee help me out here, I fail to see where it distinguishes between the size of business. Your argument is definitely weak, because it does slam business, and you can thank Obama for that.
OH GOD, help me, this is the funniest thing I have ever seen! The very people that a fair distribution of resources and wealth would help are against it because the people with all the wealth (stolen) have convinced them to be against their best interests Dear god you people are dense... Do you know how the wealthy got their wealth, most of them? You simply cant cure this level of dumb