Saudi Press: U.S. Blew Up World Trade Center To Create ‘War On Terror’

Make a relevant point if you can. Watch some of their last will and testament videos. Yes they "Eagerly volunteered"

 

Who are "They"?

 

The Saudis were the "muscle".. They may not have even known it was a suicide mission.

Unless you spoke with them before the attack how would you know they "eagerly volunteered"

 

Muhammed Atta and the core group.

 

If an American joins a terrorist group and participates in an attack on, say, Britain, does that mean the U.S. was responsible for the attack?

 

So a bunch of Saudis plotted, planned and carried out 9/11 to make sure that everyone knows that a bunch of Saudis plotted, planned and carried out 9/11? Well it worked. We all know it. But what's your point?

 

Breitbart and freethroughtproject?
Proof that the US government was involved please. Free fall buildings might point to demolition, but doesn't point to US gov implication.

Conspiracy forum again?

 

From their videos. Like I said. Where is YOUR evidence that they did not eagerly volunteer, leading you to conclude I am a "hot mess"? Or do you always attack the messenger when you cant dispute the message.

 

No. Did you have a relevant point or just stupid questions?

 

Welp I'm a dumbass amd stand corrected. Apologies to both of you for the misunderstanding.

 

I never made any silly claim that they "volunteered eagerly". Own it and quit trying to deflect.

 

Muhammed Atta like OBL was a follower of Al Banna.. .. and, Saudi Arabia revoked OBL's citizenship in 1994 and declared AQ a terrorist outfit.

The terrorists wanted to start a war between the West and Saudi Arabia or Muslims in general..

 

However, in an interview with Daily Ummat, Osama bin Laden rejected Al-Qaeda's involvement in the September 11 attacks.[3][4]

In Osama Bin Laden's November 2002 "Letter to America", he explicitly stated that al-Qaeda's motives for their attacks include: Western support for attacking Muslims in Somalia, supporting Russian atrocities against Muslims in Chechnya, supporting the Indian oppression against Muslims in Kashmir, the Jewish aggression against Muslims in Lebanon, the presence of US troops in Saudi Arabia, US support of Israel, and sanctions against Iraq.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motives_for_the_September_11_attacks

- - - Updated - - -

Provoke war with the United States[edit]

See also: Pan-Islamism and Secularism in the Middle East

Some Middle East scholars—such as Michael Scott Doran and Peter Bergen—have argued that 9/11 was a strategic way to provoke America into a war that incites a pan-Islamist revolution.

Doran argued that the attacks are best understood as being part of a religious conflict within the Muslim world. In an essay, Doran argued that Bin Laden's followers "consider themselves an island of true believers surrounded by a sea of iniquity".

Doran further argued that bin Laden hoped that US retaliation would unite the faithful against the West, sparking revolutions in Arab nations and elsewhere, and that the Osama bin Laden videos were attempting to provoke a visceral reaction in the Middle East aimed at a violent reaction by Muslim citizens to increased US involvement in their region.

Bergen argued that the attacks were part of a plan to cause the United States to increase its military and cultural presence in the Middle East, thereby forcing Muslims to confront the idea of a non-Muslim government and establish conservative Islamic governments in the region.

wiki

 

Did I say that the U.S government was involved? It's your allies Saudis that accused your government of committing a grave crime against your own people.

I hold Saudis responsible for all terrorism across the globe. Their racist, vile and wicked Wahhabi ideology is almost exclusively responsible for Sunni Muslims committing unspeakable atrocities.

 

Without ever knowing a single Wahhabi or what Wahabbi is about.

 

I've seen Saudi school curriculum and what they teach their kids. I've also seen what kind of 'books' are given to British Muslims in Saudi sponsored mosques.

A racist, vile and wicked ideology responsible for Sunni Muslims committing devious crimes against humanity. Anyone defending Wahhabi terrorists should also be added to the government's watch list.

 

Evidently the meaning of "NOT" escapes you.

 

You believe the crap you have been told by propagandists, who like you have never set foot in a Saudi school.

- - - Updated - - -

Who benefited from 9-11?

http://www.911review.com/motive/index.html

 

There are any number of people on this forum advocating the exact same theories.

 

Actually, what they are teaching is Islam. Wahhabis are certainly champions of spreading the doctrine, but the doctrine they teach is Islam. The only thing that distinguishes Wahhabi Islam from every other salafist or fundamentalist strain of Islam, is the agreement between Ibin Saud and Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab in the 1700s whereby Islamic government was divided, with all temporal matters the realm of the Saudi Royals and spiritual matters the domain of the Wahhabis. The very agreement that Al Qaeda and ISIS reject.

 

Is that your opinion or are you privy to inside info? I ask this because it was an Al Qaeda op, and that's who we went after. That the men were mostly Arabs is irrelevant. But if it turns out that members of the Saudi ruling class had foreknowledge or helped the attackers in any way, that would be different than your opinion. And obviously, they should be taken to task on it.

 

Many others have set got in a Saudi school and have witnessed their teachings and textbooks, as well as its consequences. Their ignorance and bigotry has been well established.

https://www.minnpost.com/global-pos...-arabias-school-textbooks-still-teach-bigotry

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices...und-this-torrent-of-saudi-bigotry-435455.html

 

They're angry over being held responsible for their role in 9/11, so now they're going to side with the woo woo crowd The sooner the US is done playing nice with that idiotic regime, the better. It's criminal to me that we're allied with them and permit them to carry on as they do. Same with Pakistan, home of the Honor killing.

 

So they're saying that the planes were used to hide the supposed fact that the buildings were really brought down by explosives? But why in the heck would terrorists want to hide the explosions? Heck, the goal was to bring down the building by hook or crook. If the explosives did the job, then the planes were an unnecessary thing which only complicated the whole matter and could have upset the explosive charges or something. Anyway, it's stupid. Furthermore, to say those were explosions as the floors collapsed is to ignore the common sense law of displacement. Ever been drenched by a car going thru a puddle? Was the car a clever attempt to camouflage the explosion which displaced the water? Ever plopped a fish filet onto a plate of flour and had flour blow out all over the countertop? It's not an explosion. It's displacement. The Saudi legal expert who wrote that piece must really think we're stupid.

 

Or, using the digital model, they are telling the truth and the woo woo crowd of non-believers was right all along....