FBI May "Leak" Clinton Email Probe If DOJ Blocking Continues

Doesn't matter if it was hacked.

Trump's going to have fun with this.

 

You can bet your ass that the FBI will release info as needed if Obama and the DoJ blow them off. Still way too many professionals there who will not go quietly into the night.

- - - Updated - - -

No. If the FBI does not get its way .

 

Try:

http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...its-integrity-reputation-protect-hillary.html

 

They are all dirty, it's rare when the dems turn to eat each other . But Obama thinks he is the king and the Clintons want it back . It is too hard for either one of them to not be the supreme master ruler. They have big head syndrome., they are not for the people.

 

It will (*)(*)(*)(*) Obama off for his legacy to wind up with Trump in the presidents office.

http://thehill.com/policy/national-...i-could-leak-details-from-clinton-email-probe

 

I think I heard someplace that the investigation has gone far beyond emails and into fraud and corruption. The Associated Press is investigating Hillary and possibly a larger group of politicians.

 

There was a governer of Louisiana Edwin Edwards who was idolized in spite of his blatant criminality was even brought up on RICO charges.kept getting re elected. And he was a run of the mill governer.
maybe we'very become the United states of louisiana.

 

You didn't hear that from anywhere credible as no one credible has said such a thing. Don't listen to everything you hear on the Internet... you'll be very disappointed.

- - - Updated - - -

Just like Romney was going to bury Obama with Benghazi? Lmao. You guys focus on the weirdest things. No one is going to all of a sudden vote for Trump because Hillary had a private email server. Don't you guys every learn anything?

 

He participated in exchanges where he was sending classified information to her server and receiving classified information from her server. HE has a duty to insure those exchanges are over secured systems and to secure equipment and he has the GAUL to proclaim her innocent of wrongdoing.

- - - Updated - - -

It's like a nightmare, it just keeps getting worse.

 

The attempts to cover up that have already been exposed, using only her personal serverer outside the grasps of the National Archive, her attempts to destroy evidence by wiping the server, her personal IT pleading the 5th amendment, I could go on and on, the continued obfuscations and TWO FEDERAL JUDGES have admonished the State Department SEVERAL times for be uncooperative and not releasing the information.

 

What specifically do you acknowledge she did wrong?

 

None of that was a cover up. She was legally allowed to delete personal files, she was allowed to use an external server for non-classified information. She hasn't covered anything up. You guys just call everything a cover up, lol. And who cares if he pleads the 5th. That's just standard procedure in this day and age of partisan politics. You guys have absolutely nothing except made up fairy tales and dreams. Like all your other made up conspiracies that failed. Fast & Furious, Birthergate, Benghazi, IRS targeting, Solyndra, etc, etc, etc. It's absolutely hilarious how you guys keep on trucking along, but really fun to watch you constantly fail.

 

Have you ever served in a position where you were required to handle sensitive or classified information?

Seems pretty damned clear to me!

 

She probably should have used her government address on anything questionable and used two blackberry's and made sure there was no possibility of any classified information being sent or received, even though she did a pretty good job of not doing so on her own.

 

What classified information is OK to store in a non-secure system and to discuss on an unsecured email system that did not even have basic encryption and can you point me to the law that makes this distinction?

Oh geez, and they were monitoring the ports on her computer? Do you even know what is a SCIF and SCI secured equipment?

 

The courts obviously don't agree with you, otherwise this would be over. It will come down to how classified the information is. Most likely it will amount to nothing but "don't do that again".

 

Thanks for writing this in public. Classified information is classified and secret service now protect networks?! You know that hackers dont break in and physically steal the server right?

 

Her private personally paid for IT guy did NOT have the highest security clearance and neither did the other companies involved but you just said confirms multiple felonies occurred and her being not that dumb that includes her.

Tell me if they all knew what they were doing and nothing was wrong about it why did that IT guy plead the 5th to avoid having to testify and then had to be granted CRIMINAL immunity for his role in the scheme?

 

Insert your fingers into your ears, and keep singing, "lalala". Because the AP investigation I quoted was pretty incriminating.

 

Well, none of what she sent was marked with any type of classification markings. It will come down to how classified the information is and if she should have known the information was classified. Her argument is that the information is not classified and should be shown to the public. You should appreciate that! Don't you want more transparency from your government?

I know enough to know that there are way smarter people that are protecting her server than you or I.

 

I've been calling you guys on your bs for the past 6 years and haven't been wrong once. You guys believe anything you read on your conservative .com sites, it's hilarious.

- - - Updated - - -

I never said they protect networks. You said it was in an insecure "location". And yes, people can physically steal a server to get information out of it.

 

leak confidential information... ????

lol, purely political in nature, they should be charged with trying to interfere with a official election if they leak confidential information

.

 

Is Top Secret classified enough for you?

Hillary Clinton emails declared 'top secret'

 

Yes that was a coverup that's how they work.

She was legally required to turn over all her communications that passed through the sever she was using for her OFFICAL business on a regular basis and she had no authority to destroy those electronic communications.

"
Specialists interviewed by The Post said her practices fell short of what laws and regulations mandated. Some of those obligations were spelled out a few months before Clinton took office in National Archives and Records Administration Bulletin 2008-05, which said every email system was supposed to “permit easy and timely retrieval” of the records.

The secretary of state’s work emails are supposed to be preserved permanently. In addition, rules also mandated that permanent records are to be sent to the department’s Records Service Center “at the end of the Secretary’s tenure or sooner if necessary” for safekeeping.

Under Title 18, Section 2071, it is a misdemeanor to take federal records without authorization, something that is sometimes referred to as the “alienation” of records. The law is rarely enforced, but a conviction can carry a fine or imprisonment.

Jason R. Baron, a former director of litigation at the National Archives and Records Administration, told the Senate Judiciary Committee last year he believed that Clinton’s server ran afoul of the rules. In a memo to the committee, Baron wrote that “the setting up of and maintaining a private email network as the sole means to conduct official business by email, coupled with the failure to timely return email records into government custody, amounts to actions plainly inconsistent with the federal recordkeeping laws.”

http://www.politicalforum.com/curren...took-root.html

Wrong, not only did she violate those rules and laws she violated a direct order by the President to ONLY use government email addresses and servers for official government communications, she violated her OWN directive to the State Department and she was told repeatedly of the dangers she was posing by NOT doing those things that were mandated.

Why on earth would you elect her President when she has no respect for national security or the law or the rules of government ESPECIALLY when she act so recklessly, even you admit she engaged in wrongdoing. Well you don't get second chances when it comes to classified information and our national security.

She was supposed to immediately turn over her communications and she did not, she destroyed the electronic records which was destruction of government property, she lied about classified information being on that server, and in the same breath she clearly stated the SHE KNOWS what is classified and what is not. Her IT guy had to plead the 5th and then get criminal immunity from a federal judge. TWO FEDERAL JUDGES are jumping off their benches over the delay and obfuscation going on between Clinton and the State Department. She lied about her communications with Blumenthal and attempt to destroy them even though the dealt with official actions and government policy and this after she was SPECIFICALLY told by the PRESIDENT to conduct NO government or Stated Department or foreign policy matters with him, do not discuss them with him

No we call coverups when there are coverups and you better care who pleads the 5th when it is persons involved with our national security and YES that is part of a coverup.

Tell me what would it take for you to believe there is some kind of coverup.