Holy Synod condemns anti Islamic movie " incompatable with Christian values"

Lunatics would be appropriate. Howling at the moon is what they do.

 

You may be, but I'm not a lunatic. I don't howl at the moon. I'm not a believer in any form of deism let alone moon worship.

 

1) If I believed in God I would return to Roman Catholicism. Allah is a joke begun by ghazis.
2) Modern scholars have created substantial doubt about the existence of Mohammed. There were no contemporary writings which memorialized his existence. The more sophisticated view is that Mohammed was the creation of the Arab ghazis who created an empire. They were searching for legitimacy. So they created this nonsense about Allah and Mohammed.
3) Calling Muslims moon worshipers is meant as a profoundly offensive insult intended to place them on the same level as pagans and animists.

 

Well, it impacts their lives when they die, only if they go to "eternal torture" in hell or they believe its true.

 

I spent a career in the presence of Jewish lawyers. I am well aware of their opinions. I don't give a (*)(*)(*)(*).

 

I kind of believe General Eisenhower a bit more on this one.

 

Prove to me that six million Jews were exterminated, by way of gas chambers.

Or even three.

Or even one.

Not claims.

Proof.

 

Mohammed never existed. Allah is a fantasy of lotus eaters. It's all made up.

 

Hahahhaa...,


For someone who never existed he certainly made an impact on world history . Transformed a bunch of nomad desert tribes into a force which changed 6-7th century known world forever and are still remembered by 1.4 billions .

Who will remember you after the Grim Reaper came for you . ? LOL


....

 

The Arab breakout occurred during a unique moment in history. It happened during a period of imperial exhaustion in both Byzantium and Sassanid Persia. This was the moment of the Arab breakout:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Byzantine–Sassanid_War_of_602–628

The Arabs had luck on their side. Luck is the fortuitous combination of preparation and opportunity. The fictional Mohammed had nothing to do with it.

 

Wake up Albert . DUH !

Every empire - Every world power , Everyone's success / failure depends on L - U - C - K

It was Mohamed who you in yr ignorance said never existed who inspired the nomadic arabs to gain the upperhand over other competing powers .

I repeat who will remember you and what will you be remembered for when you're dead ?

 

To even comment upon this piece of trash, masquerading as a movie, is (1) to give it far more attention than it deserves; and (2) to tacitly accept the narrative that it is this movie that (supposedly) precipitated the riots and murders throughout northern Africa recently.

I decline to do either...

 

Can you show me a contemporaneous historical record that Mohammed existed?

 

No one will remember me. Now stop this personalized type of interrogatory.

 

HUH ! ? you mean like an autopsy report, a death certificate , inquest report ? Hahaha

IMO - whether he existed or not , is irrelevent It is whatever believers believe.
Same goes for Moses, Jesus , Yahwey, Zeus, Jupiter. Krishna etc>. except our Lord Dionysus , wot ? LOL
Tell you what , I've listened to robert spencer's claims , it wont make a scrap of difference to 1.5 billion believers



see this :

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States



btw - I'm NOT muslim. not likely to ever become one.


.....

......

 

LOL - You know he can't, Albert...

 

That's right. He can't show me contemporaneous historical evidence of Mohammed because there is none. The guy never existed. Mohammed was as real as Mr. Magoo.

 

LOL - Those "claims" didn't originate with Spencer, Marlowe, and it would make a huge difference to a lot of people if it was found that 1) Muhammad never existed or 2) Muhammad as we know him was a myth created by Arab rulers to develop a unified "Muslim" polity that they could govern more effectively and compel to war.

 

LOL someone is unwinding here...LOL

I see that we have come a long way from raising issues of zionism and are now cutting to the chase.
Big time.

 

The way you show the existence of a person in history is from contemporaneous accounts from historians. Show me the contemporaneous records of Arabs, Sassanid Persians, Byzantines or others. You can't because the contemporaneous records of Mohammed's life don't exist.

I am not trying to prove the historical existence of any person. You are. That means the burden of proof lies with you.

I know you aren't a Muslim. You're an Islamophile.

 

If the U.S. was ever to go against the House of Saud, it would be handing over Saudi Arabia to the Muslim Brotherhood, and to extremists like Al Queda. They hate the House of Saud because they are our ally and even worse, they are willing to deal with Israel.

 

The Muslims do not worship the moon, they worship an 'entity' which lacks the attributes of our own God, and are under the false assumption that they are one and the same.

 

The thread is not about your psycho analysis of me, Liebe.

Please stick to the content, or address my specific points.

Thanks

 

Exteremists 'like Al Queda'.

Lol.

J, this is 2012, haven't you head?

These guys were always just paid merecenaries for your owners.

 

You said that joooz are another species, like spiders. We are all free to make our conclusions based on that appraisal of yours.

On this thread, as you do on all threads, you raise joos only to bemoan others for not sticking to the topic.

I will not discuss joos being a different species unless you have more than a you tube video on spiders to support your claims.

Comedy gold...hahahahaha