Obama Decries "Super Pacs", Then Forms One Of His Own

That must be why Obama "opted" outta campaign finance laws....

 

no he opted ouf of public financing. you cant opt out of laws lol

 

And we know that's BS as well. You supported the lawless OWS scumbags.

Own your dishonor.

 

I agree and made the same point.

Didn't Romney also criticize super pacs as well? But he's been using them big time. That's the rules.

So why the double standard against Obama?

We know why.

 

Conservatives are weird. They don't want their tax payer money to go to rebuilding our infrastructure or feeding the poor but they do want their tax payer money to fund Obama's campaign.

 

Luv it. Leftists must own their dishonor and wear their hypocrisy like a scarlet letter. Leftists probably don't know about the literary reference.

 

How's the fishing?

 

So, why don't you people prove your great leadership potential and abandon all of your superpacs right away?
Lead the way, sonny.
It would be a great way to show Obama up and impress the voters.
Or are you just spouting more of your dishonest faux outrage?

 

Why is that?

 

I did? I had no idea....I thought I found them obnoxious and without a purpose

 

Hmmmm

Good excuse.

So what was it about Obama 2.008 that did not see their benefits, only saw them as bad that Obama V 2.012 now greets with greedy opens arms.

It is because he is shot scared that he has to "fight fire with fire?"

 

seems like they want to punish the rich donors to his superpac....more RW classwarfare

 

the rules changed since 2008....

 

And Ubama was against those rules....until now. The guy has no character.

 

Wow, I just love all the tired, trite and worn out justifications.

Now it's a form of change the system from within. Obama has the lead, he has the power of the incumbency, Air Force One, the Presidential Seal, $1 billion in campaign funds [he says] and he STILL needs super pacs?


Some one is scared. Or just greedy

 

No partisanship is blind. Of course it is hypocritical to criticize something and then do it.

And who is it on this thread who is all to ready to point that out on the slightest occasion, but defends it on this one?

What do they call that again? Hypocrisy?

 

hes still against them, but how is supposed to change them if he loses?

lol its not as if his opponents have any interest in it.

 

then I guess none of the republican candidates will be mentioning this

 

Nothing wrong with changing one's mind.

Dems., don't worry about the sin of 'FLIPFLOPPING".

 

Not true at all. You can criticize the system you are forced to deal with without being hypocritical.

 

Wow Grok....you've uncovered sleazyness in politics!........................that's groundbreaking!

 

Exactly!...normal people call it changing your mind based on new information.

Righties like things black and white...kind of a romantic spin on the old "stay the course" thing.

 

You're not talking about Obama but yourself aren't you? You see, Obama criticized the superpac process and then he realized he could benefit from it and so will participate in the process he villified.

So, he has his lackey plead with ya'll to please understand that the repubs made him a victim and he just has to do this dirty deed.

He is a hypocrite. You will admit that won't you?

None of obamabots will call him a flipflopper. They have nullified that word for him. That is hypocritical.

Oh, he just changed his mind, ya know, presidents do that all the time ya'll.

 

He criticized the process but realized that if he doesn't work within that system he'll be at a huge disadvantage.

Sorry. This doesn't make him a hypocrite at all.

And you're going to tell us to support Mitt Flip Romney as president?

Now what does that make you?

 

fatal flaw in RW logic....

are you also shocked to know that sometimes pacifists wont let you kick their ass?