Palestinian Statehood officially acknowledged.

You gave me a great idea! Check out my new flag lol~ As for the new fabricated OBVESERVER nation of Palestine maybe they should consider changing the name to something to more accurate, example; PseudoPalestine (ie PeePee) or FauxPalestine? Lol I am serious, but at least I did include a bit of levity eh?

Reva


The Nation of Palestine is a criminal entity by default~

 

lol, I like your sig, RevAnarchist. Would you care to explain how the nation of Palestine is "a criminal entity by default"?

 

An attempt at ..er... levity, but sullied by another horrendous clanger. Palestine is not an Observer State. Oversight on your part or deliberate misinformation ?

No matter which, in your place I should refrain from using large bold type which only serves to emphasise the error, particularly when the spelling is incorrect.

Finally, " PeePee Palestine " , I think, firmly places your contribution on the correct level. Thank you for that.

 

And yet it has been recognised by the international community. A criminal entity in whose eyes? I think you'll find that the contrary to be true - your country's obstruction of the State of Palestine is the only thing that's "criminal" in the eyes of the international community. But rather than accept this (the logical thing to do when the entire world wants you to stop what you're doing) you continue to live in a fantasy world in which your military's deplorable actions are appropriate and justified, killing people, demolishing cities and building infrastructure on what is effectively foreign soil while refusing to hold negotiations on anything resembling reasonable terms and hiding behind the Security Council seat of the US; who, in truth, only want to use your nation as a proxy to achieve favourable-stability in the theatre.

 

Skinny, ' RevA ' ain't an Israeli, although that's difficult to determine by the sycophantic nature of his posts.

There are plenty of Israel Firsters in Washington who should be deported there .


Just quite why Palestine's non-member Observer Statehood should upset them so much is difficult to determine. They're supposed to be Americans, after all.

 

Wow, good thing you are not a Facist....lol

Same applies to Arab Israelis I expect? deportation?

 

Give me Hamas "resonable" terms please,

War is war, we want peace to change that but we dont have it yet, this what you see are the result of war.

 

The Rev's Christian fundamentalism and Zionist credentials would tend to indicate that his blind adherence to the rogue state is shaped by his supernatural apocalyptic belief in the rapture. One shouldn't underestimate the extent to which these fundamentalist nutters' support for Israel throughout the US is shaped by such beliefs.

 

Posters are off topic. Your post is very patronising too.

In my view one should not underestimate how islamonazi nutters and their support for all terrorist groups are shaped by their insane beliefs regarding American and Jews. See how that works?

 

I understood it was you who said Jews was a race ? Was it not ?

If that was not what you meant there are clearly many Jews who think of themselves as racially different to Gentiles; I've over the question of Jewish identity more than once before now , - to no avail.


However , I'll try again and see if anything sticks :
This is from Haaretz -
" DNA links prove Jews are a ‘race,' says genetics expert

.

In his new book, “Legacy: A Genetic History of the Jewish People,” Harry Ostrer, a medical geneticist and professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, claims that Jews are different, and the differences are not just skin deep. Jews exhibit, he writes, a distinctive genetic signature. Considering that the Nazis tried to exterminate Jews based on their supposed racial distinctiveness, such a conclusion might be a cause for concern. But Ostrer sees it as central to Jewish identity.

“Who is a Jew?” has been a poignant question for Jews throughout our history. It evokes a complex tapestry of Jewish identity made up of different strains of religious beliefs, cultural practices and blood ties to ancient Palestine and modern Israel. But the question, with its echoes of genetic determinism, also has a dark side.

Geneticists have long been aware that certain diseases, from breast cancer to Tay-Sachs, (Blooms disease- Gauchers- Nieman Pick ) - disproportionately affect Jews. Ostrer, who is also director of genetic and genomic testing at Montefiore Medical Center, goes further, maintaining that Jews are a homogeneous group with all the scientific trappings of what we used to call a “race.”
---



I know you prefer short simple answers , but the subject is much more complex than your standard "anti-semites " BS responses.

Its a long article and might prove too much for you :

.http://www.haaretz.com/jewish-world...jews-are-a-race-says-genetics-expert-1.428664

 

Islamonazi is an oxymoron.

 

Posters are off topic so presumably that means your numerous personal attacks on Jack will be deleted?

 

Can any theocracy be credible, without anti-hypocrisy laws on the books and an institution of inquiring into the veracity of any claims regarding (religious) morals.

 

How about the repetitious and false allegations of antisemitism designed to silence criticism ?

 

OMG - Have you traded in the Star Spangled. ? Hahahaha -

Dream on Rev . they'll never see you as their equal not even if you submit to the cut. - OUCH ! But dont let anything I say stop the Goy crawling to his betters , - God's chosens,.


(Useful idiot) ?

LOL

 

That too. I've dealt with that issue previously. The thing is, I agree with her that racism against Jews is a real issue as it is with Muslims and others. Such racism is indicative of prevailing economic downturns and social unrest during any given time. Minorities are scapegoated as a result and Jews have disproportionately been the target for racists historically. Today it's muslims who are disproportionately scapegoated. Liebe seems to be of the opinion that there are no circumstances whatsoever where Jews can be legitimately criticised. To do so invites the slur 'anti-semite'. This is just ridiculous.There are 'bad' Jews just as there are 'bad' Muslims. I'll be the first to criticise the actions of Wahibist Muslims and/or their apologists, but she'll defend Zionist Jews and/or THEIR apologists to the last by way of her absurd and inappropriate epithet.

 

I have absolutely no problem with Zionist jews being disparaged, not because they are jewish but because they are Zionists . Non-Zionist jews should not be held to account for the jewish fascists in Israel.

 

Indeed. Zionists are bad people whether Jewish or otherwise. As you say, its not about Jews per se and I'm sick and tired of this intellectually lazy way she uses anti-semitism as a defence for the indefensible actions of thugs.

 

So every person that supports a Jewish state is bad?

 

Rev -Goy - the only serious is that you need seriouslyb listen to what your Master - Benjiyahu has to say : (even as we know its political electioneering codswallop ) but as your Leader - you must obey and subscribe to his line if and salute the Blue Star.

Read and learn :


Israel's premier reaffirms landmark speech on Palestinian statehood

January 06, 2013|By Batsheva Sobelman




















Email

















Share



























JERUSALEM -- With general elections two weeks away, current polls continue to give Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ruling party the lead. But complacency among his supporters and a series of campaign blunders appear to have eaten away at his support and strengthened his right-wing rival, Naftali Bennett.

While Netanyahu's main rivals on both sides of the political map have published a clear platform on domestic and foreign policy, the ruling party has avoided doing so. Despite a common argument that official party platforms are an anachronism and that most key developments have typically come as a surprise, observers were keen to see how a platform would deal with Netanyahu's landmark Bar-Ilan speech.
--

Delivered by Netanyahu at Bar-Ilan University shortly after taking office in 2009, the speech was a pivotal moment for the prime minister, the Likud party and perhaps Israeli politics. In it, Netanyahu first said that under certain conditions, he would agree to a Palestinian state.

The last party platform, written before the previous elections, states that Likud will be "prepared for real concessions in return for a real and credible peace" but does not mention the phrase "Palestinian state."

Late last year, Netanyahu and then-Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, head of the hard-line party Yisrael Beitenu, announced the two parties would run on a joint list. Yisrael Beitenu's platform defines the Palestinians' demand for statehood as a means of masking their real intention, "erasing Israel as a Jewish, Zionist state." A campaign video on the party's website lists one of their achievements during their four years in government as having "thwarted Palestinian declaration of statehood."

When the joint list kick-started their campaign last month, the internal debate about the platform was still ongoing.

After weeks of promises that an updated formal platform was forthcoming, Netanyahu settled the two issues in an interview Sunday. Yes, he said, the principles of the Bar-Ilan speech still apply, but no, there will be no platform.


http://articles.latimes.com/2013/ja...ster-netanyahu-palestinian-statehood-20130106


--

imo - its just another loab of Benji -BS..

But new Israeli REVerend Anarchist - its the word of God.


... .

 

Stuipid might be a better term. 25% of Israeli citizens are not jewish.

 

They have no opportunity to suggest reasonable terms because Israel always has one condition on any attempt to negotiate: that Israel be allowed to continue it's illegal expansion.

The results of war? Plenty of countries engage in war without inappropriate use of force (overkill is putting it lightly) and without building infrastructure on foreign soil.