Lesbian couple attacked in London

You can tell their religion from their mugshots? That's one hell of a special capability you have

 

]

Whoosh!

 

They do not appear to be muslims or angry obama voters from the hood

So that means their white skin is a red flag for liberals to get mad at

 

First I have heard of this story.

It never went viral like the ladies in London did and the sex/gender of the victims may have played a part (evil white middle class MEN). Gay white men appear to be losing victim status in the eyes of the MSM. They need to get behind all women, all brown people, all Muslims and all transgender people. Blame the MSM for not making this viral.... not us.

 

Shall we see from page 1 what religion they must be:

Muslim perps?

This is the UK. Christians in the UK are almost tiptoeing on egg shells.

Well nothing was mentioned about the religion of the attackers, which means there is a good chance they are.

One religion produces most of the dick heads, can you guess which one?

Doesn't rule out some of they could have been Muslim.

Clearly you are too slow to see the links.......and it went right over your head (as well as Mac) where many of "you" claim over and over again that if the description of attackers is not given then they must be black or Muslim and time and time again "you" are proved wrong which does not stop "you" making the same claims on subsequent events as seen in the extracts from 5 posts on page 1.

Perhaps you can explain how giving the colour or religion of the suspects is essential "So women can know what kind of people to be on alert against, for their own protection". ?

 

yes, I am comparing Muslims Religious fanatics to Christian Religious fanatics, they both have them saddly

 

So lemee understand your "logic":

You post a threadjack article and discuss how IN the threadjack article it doesn't describe the perps religion or colour - and when Mac points out how within your threadjacking article the mug shots clearly show the perps colour, you start discussing the actual OP again and how you can't tell from that.

So, which story are you discussing? Before we go on, you're gonna haveta make up your mind which one suits whatever narrative you're spinning. Thanks in advance.

 

Ever literate person obviously understands attacks on Gays are not limited to Muslims so your concerns are unnecessary. However it is only in Islam where they are murdering Gays, and according to law, which makes them unique.

Their hatred of Gays has been well established. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news...se-of-belonging-poll-homosexuality-sharia-law

 

There are mug shots? Can someone share the link or the shots?

These guys suck as human beings.

 

And atheist and agnostic fanatics as well but right now it's all about numbers and teachings and the laws being enforced. The argument that everyone does it only serves to distract from the reality that Muslims treat Gays badly as a matter of law, teachings and culture. And your attempts to distract from that point is obvious. Why?

 

When's the last time the KKK attacked Gays and how many Gay victims were there? Do you really want to compare the numbers of Muslims murdering Gays with the KKK, and in a country where the murdering of Gays is illegal? https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/islams-jihad-against-homosexuals

 

And they persist because of religion.

 

So are you saying that the usual suspects on this forum don't say that the culprits must be black or Muslim when no description is given? Are you that slow to not see that the post was a general statement of those people. Did you miss the (more sarcasm) insert?

Perhaps to make it simpler to you I should have added the word "if" making the statement "Oh, IF it doesn't mention their religion or colour so they must be Muslim or black (more sarcasm)"

 

Funny but when Mac referred to the fact that you can see what color skin they have because of their mugshots, you responded with

To paraphrase, are you so slow that you can't even recall your own post? You sure weren't being sarcastic there. Or are you simply being willfully obtuse? Your argument is nonsensical either way.

 

And why have you ignored the statement that Mac replied to:
Oh, it doesn't mention their religion or colour so they must be Muslim or black (msore sarcasm)

Now point out how a mug shot can identify a religion, you know, the context related to this thread where "you" have assumed that the boys must be Muslim because no information has been released

 

yep, I said that earlier as well, atheists and agnostic fanatics can be dangerous too (but as you said, their numbers are smaller), more kill in the name of a God, and mostly the Abrahamic God as of the last 1000 years

 

when is the last time a white nationalist killed someone?

when was the last time the kkk killed someone?

pretty recent, I know about the black church killings

 

And it's Muslims who are not only prejudiced against gays but also murder them. To blame all religions for the actions of Muslims is silly.

 

You don't have to convince me that there are crazy people who kill innocent people but its only Muslims, in Islamic ruled countries, who do it with the backing of the law. When did anything like this ever occur in the USA, Canada or any other non Muslim country? And it's only one example. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/8951952/saudi-execution-gay-confessions-beheading/

 

I picture some kind of lizard being attacked.

Lesbian...lizard



Question...

Why are homosexuals referred to being gay when in fact they aren't happy, always complaining and whining and demanding special privileges, protections and rights others don't have ?

Gay
GAY, adjective

1. Merry; airy; jovial; sportive; frolicksome. It denotes more life and animation than cheerful.

Belinda smiled, and all the world was gay

2. Fine; showy; as a gay dress.

3. Inflamed or merry with liquor; intoxicated; a vulgar use of the word in America.

GAY, noun An ornament. [Not used.]

 

"Oklahoma GOP candidate: Stoning gays the ‘right’ thing to do"

http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/gop-candidate-stone-gay-people

sadly it's not just Muslims

 

yeah, how dare these women complain about being beat up by straight people </end sarcasm>

 

What an absolute disgusting post.
5 teens have been arrested.
The muslim mayor condemned the attack.

Metropolitan Police said in a press release Friday that four alleged attackers aged between 15 and 18 years old were arrested on suspicion of robbery and aggravated grievous bodily harm. They were taken to separate police stations for questioning, authorities said.



A fifth person aged 16 was arrested on Saturday morning, police said.

Police Detective Superintendent Andy Cox condemned the assault as a "disgusting attack."

London Mayor Sadiq Khan tweeted that "hate crimes against LGBT+ people will not be tolerated in London."
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...ck-against-lesbian-couple-london-bus-n1015131

I don't see a report as of yet on who the perps are. Other than teens.

 

Just infuriates me as to what happened to those women. I do have my suspicions as to who did it.

 

Exactly. There are crazies everywhere, and most people understand that. However it's only Muslims who do it as a matter public policy.