Who benefits the most from blocking the Keystone Pipeline?

Discussion in 'Opinion POLLS' started by TheGreatSatan, Jan 20, 2012.

?

Who benefits the most from blocking the Keystone Pipeline?

  1. The American People... Because oil is the devil

    4 vote(s)
    11.8%
  2. The Obama... Because he will be seen as all wise and caring

    2 vote(s)
    5.9%
  3. Canada... Because they won't waste there money on a boondoggle pipeline

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  4. China... Canada is gunna sell there oil to somebody

    9 vote(s)
    26.5%
  5. OPEC... High oil prices makes them happy

    4 vote(s)
    11.8%
  6. Democrats... Because Americans feel safer knowing they are protected from evil pipelines

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  7. Republicans... Americans will see the blocking of the pipeline as political and elect Republicans

    6 vote(s)
    17.6%
  8. Polar Bears... Cheap energy leads to more use, more use leads to "global warming"

    1 vote(s)
    2.9%
  9. Green Energy Companys.... High energy prices "force" people to invest in solar/wind

    6 vote(s)
    17.6%
  10. Unions... Because they have enough work already.

    0 vote(s)
    0.0%
  1. Professor Peabody

    Professor Peabody Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2008
    Messages:
    94,819
    Likes Received:
    15,788
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Democrat Donor Warren Buffett owner of Berkshire Hathaway and Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad. Rail costs $10 more per barrel to transport than a pipeline. You pay more at the pump so Democrats can get big donations.
     
  2. Surfer Joe

    Surfer Joe Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2008
    Messages:
    24,402
    Likes Received:
    15,546
    Trophy Points:
    113
    LMAO…What idiotic partisan poll questions. It must have been written by the sort of people who thought that Romney was going to win in a landslide.
     
  3. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    24,509
    Likes Received:
    7,250
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I highly doubt they're vetoing it over principled objections to eminent domain :roflol:
     
  4. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Fungible. A gallon of gas is a gallon of gas, no matter where on earth it is. Exchangeable, think of a dollar bill.

    Also:

    World market
    World demand
    World supply

    The world market sets the price of oil, if world supply meets / exceeds world demand the world price drops. If world supply does not meet world demand then the world market will drive the price up.

    Cheers
    Labour
     
  5. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    On top of that, it will move to market anyway, just by other means and right now that means by rail through your communities, a much more dangerous proposition than a pipeline.
     
  6. Labouroflove

    Labouroflove Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2009
    Messages:
    12,838
    Likes Received:
    6,852
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The pipeline pays royalties to states, counties, municipalities and land owners. The estimate is 2.2B per year. Based on one million barrels a day flow.

    Cheers
    Labour
     
  7. Foolardi

    Foolardi Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2009
    Messages:
    47,987
    Likes Received:
    6,805
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes the obvious answer is The Green movement benefits most.
    But a POTUS has to use the Overview.The Big Picture.Think above and
    beyond the short term.But then this President couldn't even see past his
    belligerent and spiteful ways when he ordered a new Veterans memorial be
    gated and White House Tours Stopped.While with the other hand releasing
    Illegals from prison with felonies.
    Which then begs the question. Who benefits Most from Obama
    being President.
     
  8. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    How so? Piping the oil is greener than shipping it on trains powered by deisel fuel. THE ONLY ones benefiting are the Democratic party who received donations from wealthy donors on the promise they would block keystone.
     
  9. buddhaman

    buddhaman New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2014
    Messages:
    2,320
    Likes Received:
    15
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Except he's also invested heavily in Suncor which will see a significant boost in profitability if the Keystone XL pipeline is approved. So Buffet wins either way.
     
  10. ChristopherABrown

    ChristopherABrown Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2014
    Messages:
    5,149
    Likes Received:
    175
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Gender:
    Male
    Okay, you don't breath air or like drinking clean water. Only those dumb f**ks that are of the "green movement" do. When are they going to wake up to the benefits of pollution, toxins and solid carcinogenic living?

    Whining, sniveling and complaining in a devisive stupor is one thing, but no you are being downright foolhardy.

    Sure, the environmental movements are mislead, but maybe you can berate them into sharing the air they are trying to preserve. Will that be a benefit to you? Do you think anyone else will like that good air?

    Consider for a moment that life is really not about ease, comfort and convenience. Consider it is about love and assuring those you love, the next generation, have as good an opportunity to enjoy life as your
    Ancestors did or as you enjoy. Consider they might have a better opportunity IF you make the right decisions.

    Try the absurd concept of unity. Consider all political elements are grossly mislead, deceived, deprived and manipulated INTENTIONALLY!

    Consider that free speech actually has an ultimate purpose, and that is to create unity.

    Consider there are proposals for unity and action that actually make sense and amount to a fully lawful and peaceful revolution.

    http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...free-speech-choosing-limits-over-purpose.html

    http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...nstitutional-threat-thread-real-defenses.html

    http://www.politicalforum.com/polit...endment-congress-cannot-runoff-lawmaking.html
     
  11. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Now that's funny. It's funny because he honestly believes that.
     
  12. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Where does oil come from?

    Why do so many people think using oil somehow retards our ability to conduct research and development of alternate forms of energy? Have we lost the ability to multi task?

    Should we just shut down the majority of our economic activity and roll back our lifestyle until these alternate forms of energy are developed?

    I just saw on the news that a transformer on a telephone pole exploded and started a house fire. We should halt the practice of using electricity in that form from this day forward.
     
  13. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Actually just the opposite is true. The Chinese are quite comfortable watching us do things which help ensure our economy remains stagnant.
     
  14. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Democrats want oil to be priced so high that even windmills, solar panels and electric cars are more economical than gasoline even without further research and development.
     
  15. Oxymoron

    Oxymoron Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 18, 2008
    Messages:
    8,968
    Likes Received:
    56
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Coca Cola, since they require Polar bears to sell their (*)(*)(*)(*) product.
     
  16. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    59,937
    Likes Received:
    16,457
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wow - where did you get THAT??


    I have a corporation. If I choose to use your land you can not possibly think that is similar to the government deciding there is justification for a project in the national interest.

    Allowing a military base to expand, a water line feeding a city, etc. - these are legitimate uses that have no corporate analogy.
     
  17. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And then they want to carp and moan about how high oil prices are hurting the poor and middle class.
     
  18. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Only when there is a Republican President they can blame. 2-3 years ago when oil was high, didn't seem to warrant much mention in the media.
     
  19. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    58,640
    Likes Received:
    4,506
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Every state has to first approve of the project. Each states legislatures voted whether to approve the pipeline project. Its the state that approves of the use of eminent domain. The electric transmission lines benefit the power company. The rail line benefits the railroad company. The owners of stadiums benefit from the stadium. All use eminent domain to get projects built. Pipeline company is no different.
     
  20. Tahuyaman

    Tahuyaman Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 21, 2014
    Messages:
    12,992
    Likes Received:
    1,553
    Trophy Points:
    113
    A liberal can claim that falling oil prices hurts the economy causing harm to the poor and middle class, then claim that rising oil prices hurts the economy and causes harm to the poor and middle class. Liberals can always have it both ways.
     
  21. RPA1

    RPA1 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2009
    Messages:
    22,806
    Likes Received:
    1,269
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad (BNSF) currently connects the US with Canada in oil transport. Owned by Berkshire Hathaway...BNSF transports 500,000 barrels a day.

    "Warren Buffett’s Burlington Northern Santa Fe LLC is among U.S. and Canadian railroads that stand to benefit from the Obama administration’s decision to reject TransCanada Corp.’s Keystone XL oil pipeline permit."

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...-among-winners-in-obama-rejection-of-pipeline

    Liberal blogs deny this however, business is business and Warren Buffet understands profit. Buffet is a huge contributor to Obama.
     
  22. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    typical lib, dodges the question. "Who benefits the most from blocking the Keystone Pipeline?" Bring it....
     
  23. Riot

    Riot New Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2013
    Messages:
    7,637
    Likes Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So Obama's legacy is that he pulls out too early and he refuses to lay pipe?
     
  24. TheGreatSatan

    TheGreatSatan Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2009
    Messages:
    21,269
    Likes Received:
    21,244
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I've seen liberals take a house from old people to build a shopping mall because the mall makes more tax revenue.
     
  25. WillReadmore

    WillReadmore Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2013
    Messages:
    59,937
    Likes Received:
    16,457
    Trophy Points:
    113
    My comment was about the difference between government using eminent domain vs. corporations using eminent domain.

    So, I'd need more info on how your comment relates to that. But, you may well have a case of abuse of that power.
     

Share This Page